Didn’t they US used to send special forces out to rescue people like that in the past?

  • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Didn’t they US used to send special forces out to rescue people like that in the past?

    You’ve watched too much Jack Ryan/Tom Clancy propaganda.

      • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Yeah sure, they’ll do that… for cia agents.

        The guy in question here wasn’t trying to overthrow a non US aligned government.

        • Nyoka@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 days ago

          On that, we are in complete agreement. We will do whatever it takes if it’s feasible and the admin actually wants the person back.

          Pretending any nuclear nation couldn’t get one man (or his corpse) back from a Central American prison is a farce.

    • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      5 days ago

      It is funny how all the things our lawmakers and pundits call “national security” don’t actually ever seem to do anything to guarantee our physical safety. Kinda like how “the economy” doesn’t have much to do with how close most of us are to poverty.

      • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        5 days ago

        National security, the economy, welfare, etc are not meant for the likes of me and you. It’s meant for the rich and powerful, and all of the above is working exactly as it should… for them.

      • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 days ago

        The truth is the US is essentially invincible when it comes to its actual physical security. The US dominates the North American continent. To the north and south it borders (until recently) friendly nations that have a fraction of our population and economy. Canada and Mexico could put up a good fight and insurgency if the US tried to invade and annex them, but the idea of either starting a war of aggression against the US is comical. It would be downright suicidal for either to voluntarily start a war to try and conquer territory from the US.

        To the east and west, the US has two vast oceans. No Eastern Hemisphere power is ever going to be able to build a sufficient force to try to directly invade the US mainland. Not only does the US have a vast navy, the distances involved are simply insane. The only way an Eastern Hemisphere power would ever have hostile troops on US soil is if there were some civil war within the US that a foreign power involved itself in.

        And to top it all off, the US maintains the most powerful nuclear arsenal on the planet. A nuclear bombardment is really the only threat to the US’s physical security, and the US would make sure that this was an act of suicide on the part of its attacker.

        Oh, and just for fun, the US is absolutely awash in civilian firearms. We can’t even keep our children from getting a hold of them and shooting up schools. And that’s just a handful of troubled kids. Imagine what it would look like if some foreign power actually tried to put troops on the ground in the US. We literally have enough guns to put a firearm in the hands of every man, woman, and child in the country. We’re a nation of gun nuts with a cultural that celebrates and fetishizes militant independence and resistance.

        The only real threat to the US’s physical safety is internal. If the US ever falls, it will be because of our own internal instability, not because of some hostile invasion by a foreign power.

    • SeaJ@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      It’s only been five years since we did that exact thing in Nigeria…