• Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    So it was unclear to me from the article if it simply made priests mandatory reporters or if it went further. My understanding is that mandatory reporters don’t have to report past occurrences specifically. They only havecto report if it is currently happening or they suspect going to happen. If that is the case, it should be fine. Confession isn’t about what you are going to do.

    • Caedarai@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      44 minutes ago

      It would be fine as long as it didn’t apply to confession where the seal of confession applies to all information. Any other time the priest can and should use any information available to him properly, and that could include that sort of reporting. But the seal is absolute. And honestly it’s protected by law, by the constitution and case law, so the Washington law is a hassle but completely toothless as it’ll be struck down the moment any challenges to it get brought to the right courts. The authors had to have known it was unconstitutional, so it was basically just them doing this for show, and to antagonize Catholics.

    • TWeaK@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Priests are being made into mandatory reporters in Washington state. In Washington state, the mandatory reporting law appears to require reporting of all past events of abuse - it does not make reference to recent acts or imminent risk.

      Sec. 2. (1) (a) When [any member of these groups] has reasonable cause to believe that a child has suffered abuse or neglect, he or she shall report such incident, or cause a report to be made, to the proper law enforcement agency or to the department

      https://app.leg.wa.gov/billsummary/?BillNumber=5375&Year=2025