• LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Imprisoned for what? I can’t see how any jury could ever convict someone “beyond a reasonable doubt” or what not on someone saying something. Most prosecutors would likely say you’d need more evidence to even start building a case. Now if the person went to the police and reported being sexually assaulted and then the priest came forward it might go somewhere, but even then it may not go anywhere if there wasn’t evidence. They have to prove someone performed an illegal act, which someone’s word counts for shit. We could get 1,000,000 people to say pdiddy raped Selina Gomez, but without any other evidence, it shouldn’t go anywhere with the way our justice system is set up.

      Public Defender: “were you there?” Priest: “No”

      • theotherbelow@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        It is illegal to be complicit in child sex abuse.

        “Oh but the rapist must be comfortable in knowing their confession is scared knowledge”

        Rights never are allowed to harm others so gravely. Will this law flush it all out? Doubt it, but the duty to protect children has nothing to do with religion.

        I find it hard to believe this is controversial.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      It’s not yours, though. It is the choice of the state/federal prosecutors. And that’s where this gets hairy.

      Because the modern political order is dripping with pedophiles and rapists and accomplices to the same. They go about openly admitting to their crimes, while silencing their critics and avoiding any kind of punishment. Meanwhile, they unleash the fully-unchecked power of the police, in defiance of court order and legislative statute, to arrest and remove suspects without trial or even serious investigation.

      A legal system operating in this capacity - one in which a donation to Trump’s bitcoin fund matters more than the contents of a case file or a jury’s verdict - cannot deliver anything resembling justice.