• finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Mixed feelings

    Obviously the clergy have absolute values which they believe come from god, so obviously they’re not equipped to make exceptions such as this as individuals. You would have to appeal the to pope and cardinals directly to change the rules.

    How does the state intend to enforce this? Is there a priest registry in washington state, and does it account for all recognized religions for tax purposes? Are they going to take away peoples license to preach?

    • Dragonstaff@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 hours ago

      During the investigation of child sexual abuse, if the perpetrator is a Catholic, they’ll ask if the abuser confessed. If so, the priest is liable to be prosecuted.

      Honestly, my biggest problem with the law is how unlikely it is to ever be prosecuted. Proving that an abuser confessed would be impossible. They are infringing on the First Amendment and ensuring that no abuser ever talks to their priest, but in practice priests probably won’t follow the law and if they don’t the state is unlikely to actually enforce the law.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        If they only ask Catholics that sounds like it also infringes freedom of religion first amendment rights. They either have to ask every perp which church/temple/mosque/etc they go to and if they ever told a clergy member or none of the perps.

        • Bio bronk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Aiding child abuse isnt a first amendment right. You are only allowed freedom to practice religion and the government can’t force you to practice anything else. Confession isn’t protected by this.

          • Dragonstaff@leminal.space
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            This is wildly outside of the mainstream interpretation of the first amendment. Whether the law would be upheld by the court is basically a toss up.