• FMT99@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    107
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    Presidential pardons are one of those incredibly stupid things that show in the end America just wants a king.

    • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      They do arguably have a point to existence I think, in that it is virtually impossible to create a completely ideal set of laws, and so there are always going to be cases where a person is technically guilty of breaking a law but hasn’t done anything that punishment is appropriate for, or who is probably falsely convicted but has failed to prove it and run out of appeals and resources. They have a serious potential for misuse, but literally any power does, electing the kind of person that would misuse them will always cause problems of some kind.

      • cygnus@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        39
        ·
        4 days ago

        Then pardons should at minimum be the purview of the Senate or House, instead of a single person.

        • brianary@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          26
          ·
          4 days ago

          I think the rationale is that, when it’s a single individual, they can’t pass the buck or blame the group. It’s a final appeal at a human level.

          The trick is not electing a troll.

        • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 days ago

          That’s how it effectively works in most of the Western world. The head of state usually issue pardons but on advise of the government (especially in countries where the head of state is not the head of government) or an independent comission.