• Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Fuck RCS.

    Twenty years too late for a “protocol” that is bound to hardware - something we decided was a bad idea forty years ago, and part of why TCP/IP became the standard.

    XMPP is a far better protocol, and has had all the features of RCS for 20 years.

    I will never use RCS.

    • unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      XMPP does have something that breaks my heart: it bounds encryption to a very specific client. So forget about migrating to something else and keeping your history somehow. Which is very sad for supposedly interoperable protocol.

            • unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              That’s a terrible UX. If you have a protocol independent from clients, at least the chat database backup should be standardized. It’s not.

              That means you’ll forever get stuck to one client. This is absolutely terrible for any organization.

              • leetnewb@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                15 hours ago

                Why would an organization use OMEMO if it doesn’t fit their requirements? OMEMO isn’t necessary for encrypting xmpp communications. Also, I get the concern that only the original client will have a full history of the user, but most people don’t need a complete chat history. Or put another way, wanting a complete, unencrypted chat history is relatively orthogonal to wanting perfect forward secrecy.