I use it because it has a built in adblocker, and well it just works.

There is some crypto bullfuck and AI shit you can easily opt out off, and some talk about some CEO making homophobic comments.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Why use Brave when you can use Helium or Cromite?

    Helium has full (not lite) ublock origin built in, and no junk.

    Cromite has rather obsessive antifingerprinting, making it extremely difficult to track you compared to Brave.


    Basically, people use Brave because it’s got SEO; it’s the first result when people type in “Adblock browser” unfortunately.

    • Earl Turlet@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I used Cromite for a long time. Then one update the author added a 60 Hz refresh rate cap to help with avoiding fingerprinting with no way to turn it off. It now has an option, but for about a month it didn’t; the author fought it. The janky scrolling was annoying enough to make me stop using Cromite (and I moved to Brave, ironically). I’d switch back but I’m lazy.

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah, Cromite is definitely a “second browser” to keep around for shopping and such, not my primary one. Its opinionated development is exactly why is so good in that niche, but it also breaks a few sites and features.

        In that spirit… why only use only one browser? You can keep Brave installed.

  • headset@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Ahh yes. Brave the bloated browser with very dodgy behaviour. You get a chrome fork with crypto shit, leaky VPN, ridiculously bad search, and a full blown ad engine that hijacks your notifications and tracks you in an ‘anonymized’ way. FUCK.THAT.SHIT.

    • Sunsofold@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Not to be antagonistic, but

      • chrome fork - much of the browser world is this
      • crypto shit - opt in not mandatory
      • leaky VPN - opt in not mandatory
      • bad search - opt in not mandatory
      • ad engine - opt in not mandatory

      So, basically, it’s a chrome fork, and some people prefer chrome based browsers, so it’s purely preference?

      • gwl [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        You know what’s better than that?

        The browser world that’s not a chrome fork, and not full of crypto and AI SHIT

        Waterfox, Librewolf, Ironfox, Fennec, Ladybird, etc

      • Bahnd Rollard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        The main issues a lot of the FF purists on this site take with Brave is-

        1. its a chrome fork, which is a hard stop for them, and thats a good enough reason alone to avoid a product given how anti-corporate and anti-google the residents of this site are.

        2. the systems in the opt-in list are still part of the application. There is an anxiety that the developer may decide at a future time that those features are not opt-in/enabled by default after an update.

        So the natural response is to advocate for browsers that simply do not have those features and are open-source so that users can verify rather than trust the dev team to not put features like that in the product. Or rigoursly vet every update installed on your system to prevent that stuff from being installrd in an update, which is not viable for most people… (Run apt update/upgrade and manually approve every package change, we will see you in a few days).

        • Sunsofold@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Thank you for at least giving a sensible response rather than irrational anger.

          Still seems odd to say software is bad for having features one doesn’t use rather than not having features one does want, but… *shrug*

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Nothing. People complain about its crypto and AI ties, but the TOU outline both clearly and they’re easy to opt in or switch off as needed. That its native adblock works better than anything else I’ve ever used is enough for me. It’s a good browser.

    People are just jerks.

    • Harvey656@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      people complain about its crypto and AI ties.

      As they should. Don’t forget the anti-lgbtq+ bullshit, or the fact that they have done many dodgy things in the past. No no, other than all they they are great!

    • VitoRobles@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      If opting out is the solution, then just use Windows and Microsoft Edge. You can just “opt out” of the features you don’t want.

      But Maybe it’s not about opting out, and giving the finger to bs behavior.

      • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        If opting out is the solution, then just use Windows and Microsoft Edge.

        You’re forgetting the adblock feature in Brave. Youtube still hasn’t figured out a way around it, even though they’ve figured out how to attack ublock several times

    • zeca@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      When using brave i would often get those captchas where you have to click on traffic lights on endless pages and more pages of pictures. I guess google tries to get those pennies back from you in this way when it detects braves adblocking. Now ive been on firefox+ublock and i dont get those infinite captchas nearly as often.

  • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Try Vivaldi. Firefox should be the primary because without it chrome has no competition.

    But Vivaldi is a very capable and feature rich browser without all the brave drama.

    • zeca@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      And vivaldi isnt open source. I like it too, but theres that advantage to firefox too

  • nocturne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    @[email protected] is the author of everything that follows:

    This is a very well written an thorough article and I highly recommend reading it. If you don’t want to however, here is a summary of the key points:

    Edit: corrected a mistake noted below.

    • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      You forgot

      • 1995 : Brendan Eich creates JavaScript over two weeks at netscape, ruining the internet forever by getting there first with a shoddy piece of shit language instead of something sensical.
      • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Later, that same piece of shit language will be used as an easy and quick way to develop applications running in neutered Chromium instances, that lead to your mouse driver software needing 500+MB of RAM all the time. At least it’s portable, when the developers actually decide to export to Linux, and not just Windows and Mac (looking at you, Logitech!), and at worst have regular OS checks in the code just in case someone decides to take the code out of the Chromium instance.

  • erotador@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    the ceo is the creator of javascript, some alone would say thats a big enough sin, but the man has also donated money to anti lgbtq bills before, so more than just offhand comments.

    • shameless@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I stopped using Brave years ago but this should be the biggest motivator to get away from the browser. The thought of what Peter Thiel is probably getting from that deal is awful.

  • Cousin Mose@lemmy.hogru.ch
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Orion on macOS and iOS also have built-in ad blockers, I don’t really understand your point. You could just as easily run a non-hostile browser that supports plug-ins cleanly.

  • Shadow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Can someone recommend an alternative browser for android?

    I hate the Firefox ui layout on Android, I like brave for that.

    • nutbutter@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      All firefox forks, like Fennec and IronFox will look just like firefox.

      You fan consider Cromite. It is Chromium but with a lot of privacy features. Same UI as chrome.

    • Ludicrous0251@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Can you elaborate more on what you don’t like about Firefox? All phone browsers feel very similar to me so I’m not sure what specific about it you don’t like. If the issue is muscle memory from using Brave, that will change once you use it for a few weeks.

      The only browsers I would consider using on Android are Cromite, Firefox, IronFox, or DuckDuckGo. Tor if you’re paranoid. All the rest are just messy and crammed full of AI slop.

      • Shadow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        The biggest thing for me is that it’s two taps to open a new tab. There’s a useless home button next to the url bar that doesn’t do anything I want to do. I like how brave has the toolbar at the bottom.

        I just took another look and saw you can turn on a tab bar at the top, which is kinda okish

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Also, in addition to what others said, Brave has been involved in some shady stuff like ad substitution/injection. See:

    https://thelibre.news/no-really-dont-use-brave/

    Similarly enough, Brendan Eich’s feed also contains some worrying content, in my opinion. Ranging from, again, retweeting right-wing activists, to weird Republican propaganda. He claims to be independent and not a Republican, but this does not make me any less worried about the type of ideas he follows.

    But yeah, if you are a big fan of AI and crypto, and are okay with having advertisements in the user interface out of the box, are okay with past attempts to steal money from websites and collect donations towards people who wouldn’t necessarily even receive it, plus you can put up with occasional privacy mistakes… use Brave!

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    It’s a crypto scam wrapped in a protection racket, built by an incompetent misogynist asshole on a base that supports Google’s hegemony over web standards.

  • BigBolillo@mgtowlemmy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    People who don’t like Brave usually are resented because the CEO doesn’t support LGBT nonsense or because the crypto stuff is added into the browser.

    If you have no problem with this stuff in general Brave is a good browser.

    Not because a software is open source it means it’s free of malware be careful of what software you use.

    Don’t forget the main objective of companies is making money otherwise there will be no money to pay people working on the company not everybody is able to work for free.

    • palordrolap@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Well, I sure don’t support people not punching you in the face, but hey, at least I’m not the one throwing the punch.

      Which Eich is doing by donating money to anti-LGBT causes.