• nevemsenki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just about how many…? Like 6 years too late. FF market share on mobile is like 0.6%.

    • El Barto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      As if extensions is the reason of Firefox faltering on mobile. Do Chrome and Safari allow extensions on mobile?

      • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Safari does. I think they’re the same as desktop Safari but it seems like a different and smaller ecosystem from the Chrome/FF one and the good ones tend to cost a dollar or two (or six). Still, I have an ad-blocker, a dark mode one, a Userscripts one, one to get rid of AMP links, and a few others.

      • nevemsenki@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s a bunch of things. Not having extensions however removed a potentially differentiating feature, which certainly didn’t help.

          • nevemsenki@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I just counted, it’s 22… and there a lot of redundancy in there. So I’d say that FF on mobile had extensions technically. Want something as extreme as RES or some video downloader? You have with fiddle with nightly… which barely any average user would.