• Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s what happens when people can do private sales without any checks 👍 FREEDOM MOTHERFUCKER!

    • trash80@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      He would still pass a background check because he wasn’t fucking prosecuted.

      Authorities said he and another man allegedly shot at a woman while she was driving with her two children. At least two bullets hit the vehicle. The charges were ultimately dismissed earlier this year and Taylor was released after court-appointed doctors testified that he was incompetent to stand trial. Under federal and state law, mentally incompetent defendants cannot be prosecuted.

      • JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Thank goodness mentally incompetent people can still purchase and own firearms, wouldn’t feel like freedom any other way.

          • butwhyishischinabook@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah but that makes it harder for people to actually address the fact that high rates of firearm ownership is a necessary, but not sufficient, condition for high rates of homicide, which has consistently been correlated with a lack of socioeconomic mobility among young adult men across societies and times. But that’s hard, so instead we just sarcastically post “FREEDOM” and “now is not the time to address guns” while, ironically, never actually doing the difficult but necessary work of discussing the underlying structural economic conditions and caste dynamics which lead to this problem. Because that’s hard.

            • Faildini@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              High rates of gun ownership is neither a necessary nor sufficient condition for high rates of homicide. “Necessary” would imply that high homicide rate is flat out impossible without high gun ownership, which is clearly not true.

        • Treczoks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Mentally incompetent Americans. Mentally incompetent people in civilized countries usually don’t even come close to guns.

          EDIT: Looks like the ammosexuals don’t like my take. Yes, people lile you are left unarmed for good in civilized countries, if you like it or not.

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Wouldn’t his status as being mentally incompetent come up somewhere? I’m not from the USA and hate guns so I don’t know all the details about these background checks.

        • MedicsOfAnarchy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          In some of our states, a “background check” is when the examiner looks up from his desk. If you’re blocking the background, he checks the “good to own a firearm” box.

          • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah except the part where it is federal law that all FFL dealers have to run an FBI NICSs check on all gun sales in every state because that is a federal law.

      • Grimy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The only paperwork I need is the one written by a bunch of old white dudes who owned slaves and barely washed 😎