• homes@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Keep your eye on the ball: 100% of the profits must pay for universal healthcare.

    • felsiq@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      65
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      I love this idea, but I’m not sure if any AI company has made any profit to date lmao

      • homes@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 days ago

        No AI company will ever make a profit.

        That’s no excuse for you to forget that human rights is our ultimate goal.

        Never take your eye off the ball. Vote for humans. Fight for human equality. 🏳️‍🌈

        • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          The thing is, their values are overstated. It’s a bubble economy. AI companies are racing for IPO specifically because they want to leave the public holding the bag when it finally crashes.

          I don’t want any stake in AI companies.

          Government sponsored public investment funds should focus on stable, long-term investments and basic essentials like utilities, telecom, housing, agriculture, etc.

          I would include healthcare and education in that list but I believe those things shouldn’t be monetized at all and should be entirely non-profit.

          But AI though is not a good investment. It only looks like one now because it’s a pump and dump. A ponzi scheme, even.

          I expected Bernie to be better than this…

          • hark@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            Not from AI, except for nvidia who sells the tools for others to lose money on AI.

          • homes@piefed.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 days ago

            Year over a year, those profits are plummeting.

            AI companies, themselves, have never made a profit

            Like AI, you’re hallucinating

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              5 days ago

              AI companies, themselves, have never made a profit

              Might as well say Internet Explorer has never turned a profit.

              They’re being incorporated into highly profitable software vendors and foisted on profitable businesses.

              Meanwhile, the companies producing the models are rapidly enriching their owners and early investors. That looks like profit to me.

          • Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            NVidia is the one selling shovels to the golddiggers, a business that always was a profitable one. If AI goes bust, they can go back to selling GPUs to gamers.
            Microsoft makes profit because they get paid by OpenAI for their Azure platform.
            Facebook makes profit because of ads? Don’t know why they were even mentioned here, their AI experiments seem mainly invested in making better bots for their platforms.

            No AI Company is profitable in any way, and barring some technological breakthrough, they never will be. Currently it’s all subsidized with huge dollar amounts by venture capitalists. The problem is that inference is expensive (You need a specialized datacenter for Nvidias new hardware, the hardware itself is expensive, the training of models costs a lot and you can never stop training new ones just to keep up with the joneses, you need lots of power to run all of this, and the GPUs used have to be replaced on the regular).

            At the moment it all gets propped up by the largest financing rounds ever, and that is without even counting the Venture Capital that gets funneled to OpenAI/Anthropic through AI startups.

            Especially the subscription model will disappear very soon. Users with 200$ Subscriptions blow through tokens costing a multitude of what they pay. API pricing per token will be the default, and those prices will make every single AI startup weep as soon as the subsidies disappear, and then close up shop, which will be the beginning of the end for OpenAI/Anthropic.

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              Microsoft has shoehorned so much of their AI into it’s OS that it’s the same product.

              Whether this tanks their OS sales remains to be seen. But your site is trying to draw a line that no longer exists.

    • blattrules@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 days ago

      They need to be funding UBI with it too. Every time a company kills a job because of AI they need to be taxed and that should go to UBI.

    • merdaverse@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      What profits? All AI companies have major losses. Except Nvidia of course, which just sells the hardware to the other companies so that they can make a loss.

      https://isaiprofitable.com/

      At best, this will just socialize the losses made by decisions of capitalists.

      • homes@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        Yes, that was the joke

        Perhaps the sarcasm was lost in the comment somehow?

        I just corrected a misspelling in my original comment. Perhaps that clears things up?