Over just a few months, ChatGPT went from correctly answering a simple math problem 98% of the time to just 2%, study finds. Researchers found wild fluctuations—called drift—in the technology’s abi…::ChatGPT went from answering a simple math correctly 98% of the time to just 2%, over the course of a few months.

  • james1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s a machine learning chat bot, not a calculator, and especially not “AI.”

    It’s primary focus is trying to look like something a human might say. It isn’t trying to actually learn maths at all. This is like complaining that your satnav has no grasp of the cinematic impact of Alfred Hitchcock.

    It doesn’t need to understand the question, or give an accurate answer, it just needs to say a sentence that sounds like a human might say it.

    • TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      so it confidently spews a bunch of incorrect shit, acts humble and apologetic while correcting none of its behavior, and constantly offers unsolicited advice.

      I think it trained on Reddit data

      • cxx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        acts humble and apologetic

        We must be using different Reddits, my friend

    • R00bot@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re right, but at least the satnav won’t gaslight you into thinking it does understand Alfred Hitchcock.

    • bric@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      This. It is able to tap in to plugins and call functions though, which is what it really should be doing. For math, the Wolfram alpha plugin will always be more capable than chatGPT alone, so we should be benchmarking how often it can correctly reformat your query, call Wolfram alpha, and correctly format the result, not whether the statistical model behind chatGPT happens to use predict the right token

    • dbilitated@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      to be fair, fucking up maths problems is very human-like.

      I wonder if it could also be trained on a great deal of mathematical axioms that are computer generated?

      • Cabrio@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It doesn’t calculate anything though. You ask chatgpt what is 5+5, and it tells you the most statistically likely response based on training data. Now we know there’s a lot of both moronic and intentionally belligerent answers on the Internet, so the statistical probability of it getting any mathematical equation correct goes down exponemtially with complexity and never even approaches 100% certainty even with the simplest equations because 1+1= window.