Starting August 7th, advertisers that haven’t reached certain spending thresholds will lose their official brand account verification. According to emails obtained by the WSJ, brands need to have spent at least $1,000 on ads within the prior 30 days or $6,000 in the previous 180 days to retain the gold checkmark identifying that the account belongs to a verified brand.

Threatening to remove verified checkmarks is a risky move given how many ‘Twitter alternative’ services like Threads and Bluesky are cropping up and how willing consumers appear to be to jump ship, with Threads rocketing to 100 million registrations in just five days. That said, it’s not like other efforts to drum up some additional cash, like increasing API pricing, have gone down especially well, either. It’s a bold strategy, Cotton — let’s see if it pays off for him.

      • Whiskey Pickle@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        for some reason, i don’t think that would stop him from trying anyway and then throwing a tantrum for being ineligible.

        • orclev@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m not convinced the GOP wouldn’t nominate him, and that the current SCOTUS wouldn’t rule he was eligible to run.

          • mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            They would probably just yell out something about Obama and then simply declare him the president.

            Edit: Someone already said this 6 hours ago. Even other people see this ridiculous situation as totally possible.

          • Mirshe@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, I get the feeling that he’d get nominated anyway and the stance would be “well we can’t do the whole election over again, so let them run”.

      • DrQuint@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m sure the Republicans would just come out of the woodwork and ask “Oh, but what about Obama, how come he can run for POTUS then?”. Which is, of course, something I already seen someone ask. Wasn’t even some old person from “different times” or whatever, this person genuinely just had no justifiable reason to be this racist.

          • Gork@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            To get access to Lesotho. That fully enclaved country has been protected long enough by South Africa and it’s time to let 🦅 Freedom™ 🇺🇲 ring.

            Next is Luxembourg and Vatican City. Pope better watch out for Uncle Sam.

            • SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Look, the US has far higher priorities than those small countries

              They really should take on Liechtenstein once and for all

    • demonsword@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not American but I confess I’m relieved that he can’t do that. Just try to imagine someone like him being able to fire nukes.

    • Saneless@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      How’s he doing on rapes, domestic violence, and paying for abortions? That’s still a requirement for that party last I checked