Tesla has consistently exaggerated the driving range of its electric vehicles, reportedly leading car owners to think something was broken when actual driving range was much lower than advertised. When these owners scheduled service appointments to fix the problem, Tesla canceled the appointments because there was no way to improve the actual distance Tesla cars could drive between charges, according to an investigation by Reuters.

  • Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I thought the range was rated by a 3rd party (EPA in the US), is that not the case? They say EPA est. on the website at least but not sure exactly what that means.

    • Square Singer@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 year ago

      It is, but there’s a big “but” with that. When the range is determined by agencies like the EPA, the car is allowed to run in the most optimal configuration, meaning:

      • No heating
      • No AC
      • No radio or other stuff running
      • No autopilot/self driving, which consumes a significant amount of power
      • They even put tape over the gaps in the body (e.g. around the doors) to lower air resistance
      • Minimal weight in the car. Only one person, no luggage, no extras that would add weight
      • Optimal weather (not too hot, not too cold)

      This way they get an artificially inflated official range. Now when a customer buys the car, loads in all their stuff and people and actually uses heating/AC/onboard entertainment/autopilot/… and drives in suboptimal weather their range would instantly show as much less than the official rating. And this is where they were cheating, and would show a range number that was closer to the artificially inflated official one.

      To be fair, though, when determining “official” fuel consumption for fuel burning cars, they do the same tricks as above. But they probably won’t cheat on the range display, since range is much less of a relevant value for fuel burning cars. Also, everyone expects fuel burning cars to burn much more fuel than it says in the ads.

      (That said, when I got my new car, a Dacia Jogger, I was really surprised that the actual fuel consumption is actually lower than the official one.)

      • bstix@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I like the Zoe for this reason. It goes longer and faster than the official stats. Maybe because it was a proof of concept car. Of course like any EV it depends a lot on the weather, so the max. range is a pretty useless metric anyway.

        Range anxiety is overblown. Any EV can handle the daily commute, and if not, I d probably consider what I’m doing with my life driving hundreds of miles every day.

      • Chris@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        EPA tests all cars stationary on a dynamometer through different cycles. Influence of air drag, air condition, cold temperatures etc. are then added through a factor that is typically 0.7 according to EPA‘s official information at https://www.epa.gov/greenvehicles/testing-national-vehicle-and-fuel-emissions-laboratory

        I agree part of the EPA range is calculated but I think it’s wrong to claim that a/c and other factors aren’t taken into account.

        I’ve driven my EV better than EPA range at times and that included using A/C and having more than one person in the car. I’m not saying that driving it that way is a ton of fun and I’m not saying that I can do that in the midst of winter. But it’s definitely possible.

      • Umbra@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The question is do other ev manufacturers use the same standards for determining range. (Answer is probably yes)

    • topinambour_rex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      For what I understood reading the article is the automaker who make the test. Then they can use the epa algorithm, or their own. Tesla did the latter. EPA asked them to reduce of 3% their results. Other brands ? They use EPA algorithm. Most have the correct result. Except for the Hyundai Kona. They underestimated their range.

    • jgardner10@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think you answered your own question there. Unless they tell you what it means you should means nothing.