At least on the communities i follow. Every so often I come across a thread where i recognize most of the users there even in the big communities with over 30k members and I haven’t even been on lemmy that long.

  • MimicJar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I post more on Lemmy since I think people will actually read what I wrote. I used to post a lot on Reddit too, but that was MANY years ago.

    However one of the big reasons I post is to hopefully get the conversation started. I figure with zero comments someone is less likely to post. With one stupid comment, someone might respond.

    • toynbee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      edit: Sorry, I didn’t realize how long the gif went. I love the movie, but the gif kind of undermines your point in situ, I think. I feel nothing but positive things about the content of your comment.

      Thank you for your contributions to the communities!

        • Bizzle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Did you the guy from that maymay was like the coolest guy in the world? He was very important in educating about sustainable farming practices. His death was a real tragedy.

  • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Lemmy.world is defederated from the major Marxist instances, so you might want to join a different instance for a fresh look. Lemmy in general is small enough to be dominated easily, what helps this is finding a good instance and treating said instance like a community with different tags, rather than treating communities like subreddits.

  • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    That’s very much possible.

    That’s why I try to be as nice as I can on here.

    There are very few times when I initially joined Lemmy where, I admit, I was a bit shitty towards some users (old Reddit habits). This can get you banned, or blocked, or you can build a reputation pretty quickly. And since we’re not a lot, that can limit your interactions quite a bit. So I changed my attitude pretty quick. And frankly it’s been much more enjoyable this way since.

    • GrammarPolice@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      This is a good way to think about it. I’ve also been trying my hand at being a bit nicer to tankies. Oops… I mean communists.

      • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I’ve also been trying my hand at being a bit nicer to tankies. Oops… I mean communists.

        So, I’m finding things reversed, I spent most of my time on reddit going at it with idiot conservatives, just blasting through their talking points and not being polite at all.

        Tankies are different because they … it’s not selfishness, it’s not just seeing themselves as the ultimate victim of “evil libruls!”, they really believe the world would be better under their fairy tale. It’s even different from a lot of religious nutjobs I’ve met, who can’t wait for their God to come back and burn everyone who didn’t appreciate how awesome they specifically were, like their dad who worked at the CIA doing Kung-Fu.

        Fortunately the tankies have weak arguments, the best of which is “China #1 now!!!”.

        • OpenStars@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          I’ll just come out and say it: there is an enormous difference between a communist and a “tanky”. For one, only one of those actually believes in communism, and for another one of them is capable of rational discussion without resorting to the “your (sic) stoopid (sp), nuh uh YOU are!” schtick. I have found it more protective of my sanity to block the other type.

        • GrammarPolice@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Hmm I don’t know which communists you’re debating on here but there are quite a few who i can say have made me reconsider my position enough times. I don’t know whether that’s because of how good they are at debating or how inherently strong their points are but i would be inclined to assume the latter. Maybe you’re just arguing with the blabbermouthed “cAPitALism Bad” folks

          • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            Some are just ‘west bad! China good!’, the last one was actually trying but I’d read Das capital and simply felt base Marxism was hopelessly outdated as a darwinism era construct social model, obsoleted by game theory and other more modern behavioral frameworks.

            I’m a moderate centrist on most issues, I think we need more social support systems to counter balance the power of corporations and the rich, I just understand a powerful government isn’t a panacea, you’re just shifting the power and therefore corruption to a different body.

              • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                No, I’m sure chomsky would be great.

                I don’t disagree with the criticism that we have far too unregulated capitalism, we need to go way back the other way.

                My issue is the stupid, faith-based, communism will solve everything, even though it never has before.

                Capitalism is corruption by the rich, communism devolves into corruption by the powerful, always.

                In the past the people only had freedom when the king and the nobles checked each other in power, which is why the founders created checks and balances. Now the king has been replaced by the government while the nobility are the rich and corporations.

                If both are balanced against each other (which has happened a few times in the past) then we have increased freedoms, often because they have to lobby the people in their struggle with each other.

                When they join forces, we have fascism, which is when things are the worst. That’s where we’re going now with our current system. That’s a problem.

                • Keeponstalin@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  The book does discuss a bunch of these topics, especially the history between capital business interests and the US government.

                  I think communism gets too muddy with everyone’s different idea of what it is, especially do to all the different countries that have ‘tried communism’ to various degrees of success. I think socialism is more tangible to talk about. Changing the structure of businesses to a democratic organization between the workers, where the profit they generate goes to where is democraticly decided (such as fair wages vs reinvestment into the business). Changing the social organization of society would be revolutionary, as it at odds with the profit motive of capital interests

    • OpenStars@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Reddit did things to us all. You couldn’t like be nice to someone bc you would get your ass handed to you. EVERY comment had to be so defensive, and primarily what worked was snark. Here… is different, most of the time (and when it’s not, we can block and move on:-).

    • aStonedSanta@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Hard agree. Lemmy feels like a town hall. A few important people providing updates on reality and we engage in discussions based on those topics. Honestly. As long as it doesn’t get corporate or super weird I’m okay with that setup. It feels a lot more like a community this way. Whereas Reddit felt like a stadium packed with people. You can shout. And no one knows where it came from.

    • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      I get snarkier than I should sometimes when I’m really frustrated with someone, but I try to be mindful of it and nip it in the bud when I can.

  • Randomgal@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Yes. I think that’s notmal, no? Some people have more time than others, and care more intensely about some topics.

    Others are bots and paid shills too, just trying to earn a living.

  • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Yes. I’ve been posting to subs around here too. I like it cause everybody will probably see your post and you’ll get engagement from real people. We also have common interests on here that things are pretty interesting.

    • P4ulin_Kbana@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      We also have common interests on here that things are pretty interesting.

      I disagree. The interests communities get no attention at all. The only things that get on the homepage are political stuff, some technology and a bit dry memes.