Then you must be in quite a conundrum with who was killed here; if you want justice for the CEO by finding the killer of the CEO, you’re supporting a murderer; if you support the killer of the CEO, you’re supporting a killer.
It takes a lot of people to make a missile, yet it only takes one to declare war. Who’s more at fault? If I steal a thousand elderly people’s retirement savings, and someone else steals my car, are we equally thieves? What if the son of a person who I stole from took it, does that change anything?
No, that would be bad. But if that retirement stealer continues to steal, and the law doesn’t do anything, and the whole system is made so he will never get any consequences, there could be a moment when shooting him in the back is the only moral decision
Then you must be in quite a conundrum with who was killed here; if you want justice for the CEO by finding the killer of the CEO, you’re supporting a murderer; if you support the killer of the CEO, you’re supporting a killer.
Tough moral quandary.
Yes, all the death can be laid at the feet of one guy. What a simplistic place to live.
Said the guy that “doesn’t support a murderer” no matter what.
Meant as irony…
Nah, you don’t get to claim “I didn’t mean it it was a joke” when people disagree with your opinion
It takes a lot of people to make a missile, yet it only takes one to declare war. Who’s more at fault? If I steal a thousand elderly people’s retirement savings, and someone else steals my car, are we equally thieves? What if the son of a person who I stole from took it, does that change anything?
Of course. So let’s shoot him in the back.
No, that would be bad. But if that retirement stealer continues to steal, and the law doesn’t do anything, and the whole system is made so he will never get any consequences, there could be a moment when shooting him in the back is the only moral decision
And exactly what happened
I like how in your quest for moral absolutism you came full circle and found the basis for absolute immortality.