There is no right to privacy which is why I think it should fall under the right against unreasonable search and seizure. They’re using your face and searching it against a database for no reason other than treating everybody like they’re a criminal to comfort rich peoples fee fees.
There is no right to privacy which is why I think it should fall under the right against unreasonable search and seizure.
and this is exactly why i would prefer a dedicated right to privacy. Makes it harder to do any funny business with the law. Just seems more comprehensive to me. Probably harder to do, but a concerted, focused effort would get it done.
well i mean yeah, healthcare is a lot harder, than passing a single amendment. Or a bill to enshrine the right to privacy in a more complete manner, than shoehorning it into an existing bill.
There is no right to privacy which is why I think it should fall under the right against unreasonable search and seizure. They’re using your face and searching it against a database for no reason other than treating everybody like they’re a criminal to comfort rich peoples fee fees.
and this is exactly why i would prefer a dedicated right to privacy. Makes it harder to do any funny business with the law. Just seems more comprehensive to me. Probably harder to do, but a concerted, focused effort would get it done.
We can’t get fucking healthcare and you think we can get a constitutional amendment passed? LOL
well i mean yeah, healthcare is a lot harder, than passing a single amendment. Or a bill to enshrine the right to privacy in a more complete manner, than shoehorning it into an existing bill.
No, passing an amendment is way harder than passing any other kind of legislation lol
good thing i didnt just restrict myself to an amendment then