• RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 days ago

    Arguably you could inherit it. Shady shit was done for the money still, sure, but not by the person with the money.

    Then you just wait for them to do new shady shit because they probably will.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Shady shit was done for the money still, sure, but not by the person with the money.

      Laundering blood money through a generation will make it clean again. No guilt if you can inherit the sins of your fathers. No complicity if you simply stand on a mountain of corpses that just happened to die for your benefit.

      • RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        It isn’t their fault they won the lottery of life. You can still judge them for their own actions, what they do with all the money.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          We all have a duty in this life to do better than our predecessors, not merely to wallow in their misdeeds and plead innocence.

          Inheriting blood money simply means you’ve inherited the obligation to right the wrongs that produced it.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Arguably you could inherit it.

      That would also be a failure of policy: namely, inadequate inheritance tax (which was specifically intended to prevent the kind of aristocracy a billion-dollar inheritance would create).