• samus12345@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Xcom programmers say the asteroid has a roughly 2.3% chance of impacting Earth in 2032.

    So it’s a sure thing!

    • Rooty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Can’t wait to empty a SMG clip into an alien’s face point blank and miss.

    • bss03@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Apophis missed the keyhole, so no chance of impact this century, sorry. It would be a much bigger event, too, about 10-30 times the energy.

      But, this noise does remind me of 2004.

      • Singletona082@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Huh didn’t think the keyhole event was til 2028 swingby. Neat. Wonder if Esa or Jacsa can get probes up in time for its next approach.

        • bss03@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yeah, I misspoke. I meant “will miss”, we’ve got enough observations that we know the “keyhole event” that was a possibility is no longer a possibility.

          • Singletona082@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Fair. All jokes and nihilism aside. Someone should take advantage of the flyby to send something up to study it.

            • bss03@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              I think it’s hard to justify since we’ve already done a successful asteroid rendezvous (a few, IIRC) and it’s unclear (to me) what we could learn from studying the surface of this particular one or even studying from the surface of this one.

              If we knew how to move it from solar orbit to terrestrial or lunar orbit and then use it as raw materials, that might be profitable. Or at least a nice engineering challenge on the way to profitable asteroid mining. But, I think the delta-V we’d have to achieve for that might me more than we are capable of right now.

              I do wonder if we could put something on it and use it as part of a measurement tool, like how they can stitch together multiple 'scope sensors? I forget what the name of that is. Differential capture? Diffusion imaging?

              It is an interesting opportunity, we rarely get such close flybys well predicted, but someone closer to the science / smarter than me would have to put together a mission plan.

    • Wahots@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      DC, please. Move all the good museums and historical stuff first, but don’t tell the administration.

    • bss03@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I don’t believe it is a possible target given how the orbital disk of the asteroid intersects with the surface of the earth. That’s of we don’t change the orbit, if we decide that is necessary, we’ll probably try to get a complete miss instead of just changing the impact site.

      DON’T LOOK UP

      • Owljfien@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Ikr, I have a bunch of terms on my filter list but then its in the comments anyway

        • Opinionhaver@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          I have separate filter lists for both, posts and comments but I need to keep adding new ones every day. I guess “Mar a lago” is the one I’m adding today.

          • db2@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            I’m talking about it right now in this reply but not giving you any keywords. Muhaha.

      • andros_rex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Well, this administration has been forcing politics into NASA by cutting funding and making all female/POC/LGBT employees unsafe/invisible. It’d be lovely if NASA was free from politics, but as we saw from Trumps last appointment of the totally unqualified Bridenstone, politics is shoving its ugly dick into science.

      • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Unfortunately in a worst case scenario this gets very political, if we do something about it in advance an impactor probe should do the job, if we decide to play the 1/50 odds and lose then the most effective short notice method is a nuke. Not a direct strike but a near detonation which vaporizes a section of the surface of the object with the outgoing plasma effectively functioning as a massive thruster. Actually doing this is not trivial but not hard either (from an engineering standpoint), the tricky part would be actually managing to launch it without every nation on earth that happens to have a beligerant leader saber rattling and stone walling the prospect of a launch until its too late even for a nuke to do any good.

    • prof_wafflez@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      The difference from the movie is that we should just end it already and force the asteroid to collide specifically to destroy us.

    • MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      There’s a study that says the effects of an impact landing in water won’t be as bad as thought.

      Also there is a way of using nukes to detonate adjacent to an asteroid or comet that slows it down without a risk of fracturing it. The heat turns the surface red hot and makes it shoot out mass and slows it down more. So we can stop basically any asteroid as long as we see it.

  • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’d be interested to see if they can capture it, rather than deflect the asteroid. We need to work on space-based manufacturing anyway, and it’d be convenient if we could get this thing parked at a Lagrange point for research and practice.

    • Singletona082@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Eh calculated impact path ranges from south america through africa and india. None of these are where i want it to land.

      • Grimy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Same here but I figure the rates are going to be really cheap so I can just use up my vacation days and travel to wherever it hits.

    • RegalPotoo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Even if it’s at the top end of the predicted range, an impact would be ~40MT equivalent. Enough to level a city, but not an extinction event by any means; plus the likely impact path is across central America, the Atlantic, central Africa and north India - not really regions that have the resources to respond to a threat like this. Personally I’m hoping it misses, because I don’t see the counties that could do something about it stepping up right now, so you’d be looking at maybe 100 million people displaced from their homes and an insurmountable humanitarian crisis

      • troed@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Most countries on Earth would treat this as a global catastrophe and put up funds regardless of where it’s projected to impact.

        Maybe not the current US, though.

      • vga@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Personally I’m hoping it misses

        In midst of all this funnymaking, I’d like to point out for the record that anybody who genuinely wants it to hit Earth is fucking insane. Some combination of sociopath and psychopath.

        • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          The only scenario in which I would really want it to hit would be if it would lead to moderate global cooling without hitting populated areas. If it can dislodge enough particulates over one of the poles to block out some sun and give us a couple of years of reprieve from global warming, without actually killing anyone or destroying much wildlife, that would be nice.

      • kreskin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        It goes without saying that this is all because of <enter your deity name here> disapproval of <enter your hated group here>.

        And the flyby is a test of ‘deity’s’ approval of our next actions. Either way we should immediately lower taxes on the rich.

        /s