Quilters would like a word.

Great share. I’ve taken different levels of first aid multiple times, including one where we had to watch real clinical death so we knew not to stop CPR when it looked like someone was “waking up.” Death doesn’t look like death either.

I appreciate the advice. I don’t know what Harbour Freight is but I know a lot about it now.

I don’t know what you’re arguing with. Planning doesn’t create new space and resources from thin air.

You must have the jaw muscles of a mastiff and the palate of beaver.

I hope to be an enthusiast soon enough, it’s one of the major tools missing from my workbench. Milwaukee -is- pretty good, and I already have the battery packs.

But after working with a shipwright who had all Bausch tools I’ve been spoiled.

Cut down many signs?

I’m in the market for a good angle grinder. How do you feel about Bauer? Spiritually I’m Bausch but economically I’m Dewalt.

I once went over the handlebars when I hit one of these. The sign was less of an ask and more of a demand.

From the article:

“The law here is a mess, and clearly many businesses will just go gender neutral to avoid the headache,

This is going to make it so difficult to plan out businesses and buildings that everyone will end up with gender neutral bathrooms and spaces. It’s my dream that all those lobby groups who think they’re protecting women will have to shit next to every man, woman, femboy, adult baby, theydy, them, zem, furry and otherkin in the UK.

Anyone who averages a ratio that low across all contributions is almost certainly not someone you want around.

That’s what banning and blocking are for, those are features already up to the users, admins and moderators. So what’s the point of the flag in the first place?

In order to notice a flurry of users downvoting the same person consistently, someone would have to be investigating. I’m a mod and I’m not sure how to begin to tell if they happened to be sockpuppets. This means tools would have to be built to monitor where votes are coming from and flag users who vote together (if they don’t already exist.) That increases mod duties to patrol a feature because it can be gamed, when, again, there are already tools for users to decide for themselves who they interact with.

If someone has nine downvotes to one upvote, they’re a troll? Or even just ninety downvotes to ten upvotes? Given how easy it is to make multiple accounts, an enterprising user could easily sway that figure for new users or people who don’t post often.

Even if you argue the system isn’t that bad, it’s built on a factor that’s easily manipulated, and therefore can be manipulated. It shouldn’t exist in the first place.

Don’t forget the styrofoam!

I appreciate that, thank you.

Everyone should make up their own minds when it comes to picking an instance, but it’s important to know who’s holding the reins.

“And to your right you will see the birch tree where my ex-wife, Tammy, lives, a thin-leaved deciduous hardwood that is short lived, but still lasts longer than our marriage.”

NAPALM that was it, my mistake. I’ll edit my post.

I was seven.

My dad didn’t give me a paintbrush so I made one by taping a chunk of styrofoam to a stick so I could paint my wooden airplane. It was oil based paint.

When my war vet father saw the styrofoam dissolving, he grabbed the can away from me, remembered the cigarette in his mouth, then shoved it back and made me put the lid on first.

And that was when I learned how to make nitro glycerine *napalm.

I don’t know what you consider extreme views. I don’t feel the need to try to handle anything.

If you’re wondering how I curate my feed, I only browse by subscribed communities. If I want to find new ones I look at cross-posts, the community promotion coms, or search by interest.

Cool.

I never suggested donating to anyone.