Yes, it’s so much better when one group of bigots burn books than a larger group of bigots burn more books.

I guess this is the lesser evil you guys keep voting for, just a little book burning and hate speech, as a compromise.

Just a pro tip, if you are ever on the side of people burning books, you’re in the wrong.

So how long have you sided with the Nazis and fundamentalist Christians?

Because now you’re excusing their book burning.

Climate change + no future prospects under capitalism + lack of support structure due to overworked parents + crushing poverty in many cases. Japan has a lot of homeless and near homeless children.

You’re on .world, an American hosted instance. As long as you remove what is actively requested by the government in a reasonable amount of time you cannot be legally held liable for any content hosted. This includes piracy or CSAM.

If no one reports the content and d you are not made aware of it, you cannot be held liable. We’ve been through this, meta and Twitter did all the hard work hashing this out in court against the riaa. Why reject their hard work instead of using the same rules that protect them?

Not in the US, where .world is held. Maybe the Finnish instances since their laws are weird, but in most countries there’s a variant of platform immunity wherein the owners are only liable if they are informed by the government about offending content and fail to take action.

Exceedingly few countries require proactive moderation, and pretty much all countries that do have a minimum user count for that moderation above the gross user count of the entire fediverse.

No, no they’re not.

That only matters if the people with guns are the ones manning the mechanisms.

Whyd you use a Chinese website instead of just running the model, which does not output that for that question?