oooh. now do economics!!

have a nice day

that’s not what your source says.

I thought you were done

think of all the people who Kamala would have imprisoned, deported, or shipped the bombs to kill. go do something to save them.

the full definition requires an act. you cherry picked one ambiguously worded section.

there are still things you can do to save the people endangered by both your vote and the people who voted for the other candidate

this is cherrypicking

except that you’re not locked in a booth, so there actually are things you can do besides pull a lever.

no, you don’t need to accept it.

it is immoral to flip the switch and murder someone. that doesn’t make the situation acceptable

but they have no responsibility for the circumstances.

you can’t murder through inaction, unless words don’t mean anything.

but some of them choose to become murderers

the whole damn trolley problem thing

doesn’t have an answer. it’s a thought experiment to expose your personal ethics. deontologists never touch the switch.

you can’t be responsible for something you didn’t cause. that’s not how responsibility works.

voting makes them responsible for the bodies.

this is bigotry

don’t tell me what to do