• BertramDitore@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    People who don’t vote don’t get to complain if things don’t go their way. I mean they can, but it’s pretty silly. It’s like writing a review for a restaurant that your friends have eaten at, but that you haven’t. No one should take that review seriously.

    I think voting should be mandatory for people who have registered to vote. I don’t think anyone should be required to register, but if you are registered you should have to vote or be fined, imo.

  • toomanypancakes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I don’t care. Popular vote doesn’t get presidents elected, and nobody local ever seems both interested and capable of making significant positive changes, at least that I’ve seen. It largely feels like theater, and in a race you can’t influence between two people pledging to continue genocide I can see why people would throw their hands up and say fuck everything.

    • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Sure, but local offices have a much larger effect on most people’s lives and that’s where voting can make a change.

  • Allah@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    and what if government tomorrow or (maybe far future) announced that they will be announcing fines for people who didn’t vote in order to maximize participation, would you agree with that decision?

    • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      This is the dumb way to go about incentivizing people to vote.

      Make voting part of doing your taxes. Everyone is already verified through the IRS, piggyback off that system. Whatever amount you had in your head as a fine, make it a tax credit if they compete the voting portion of the tax paperwork.

      People who don’t do taxes can vote by mail still and can still receive the money for voting. No more stupid fucking voting booths.

    • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      You mean, as already happens in Australia and Belgium and maybe a few other places.

      Seems fair to me. Democracy relies on participation. To not vote is effectively to vote against democracy. Fair enough, but that’s a dangerous road to go down. I think there should be a small price to pay for it.

      • masquenox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Democracy relies on participation

        You don’t exist in a democratic society. So what exactly do you want people to participate in?

        • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          No, the onus is first on you first to explain why “we don’t exist in a democratic society” and above all what is your brilliant plan for making things better. If all you can do is whine about why it’s all useless while you undermine the system by opting out of it, then frankly I’m not interested in anything you have to say.

          • masquenox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            No, the onus is first on you first to explain why “we don’t exist in a democratic society”

            Did you vote FOR the ongoing genocide the liberal status quo is funding in Palestine as we speak, genius? Were you ever given the chance, hmm?

            Yes or no?

            If no, where is your “public power?” Where is the democratic power you should have if you actually existed in a democratic society?

            To a non-brainwashed person, this would be perfectly obvious. But it’s not obvious to YOU.

            above all what is your brilliant plan for making things better.

            Now you are demanding solutions to a problem you insist do not exist. A bit incoherent, don’t you think?

            while you undermine the system by opting out of it

            ROFLMAO!

            Good job demonstrating that you don’t have the foggiest understanding of the system you are defending.

  • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    They should shut up about politics. Not voting is literally a declaration that you don’t care who governs you. Voting is what gives you the right to complain about the government. If you didn’t vote, shut up.

    • masquenox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      They should shut up about politics

      Not participating in fake, anti-democratic spectacles (somehow) “disqualifies” one from talking about politics?

      • Hadriscus@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Elections might be skewed, they might be giving voters a rather narrow choice, they might depend on who’s got the bigger campaign fund, they might not offer ranked choice, yet with all that --they’re still one of the most accessible, actionable things the average person can do to control their nation’s future. Passing on that is not justifiable, because we should be doing everything we can, and that includes voting. I used to be cynical like you, but then I took an arr I mean, we can’t afford that.

        • masquenox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Elections might be skewed,

          If you want to see this glorified rubberstamping of elite rule through those kind of rose-tinted spectacles, fine.

          But don’t call it “democracy.”

          I used to be cynical like you

          If you think seeing through propaganda is “cynicism,” boy, do I have bad news for YOU.

          • Hadriscus@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Depends on your nomenclature, I’ve heard US and France’s political systems referred to as “flawed democracies”. I personally didn’t call either a democracy, I think we’re past that quite frankly.

            If you think seeing through propaganda is “cynicism,” boy, do I have bad news for YOU.

            I call cynicism “giving in to desperation instead of acting”. I’ve explained why imho not voting was the least reasonable choice, so far you have failed to reason back. Do you think you can do that ?

            • masquenox@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              I’ve heard US and France’s political systems referred to as “flawed democracies”.

              Painting a lighter shade of lipstick on a pig doesn’t make the pig less of a pig.

              I personally didn’t call either a democracy,

              No, you didn’t. And that is legit refreshing.

              I’ve explained why imho not voting was the least reasonable choice

              I never said that not voting was reasonable. My point is that it’s perfectly UNDERSTANDABLE.

              There is a difference.

      • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        This is just ignorance and whiny entitlement. Your “fake anti-democratic spectacle” is the hard-won achievement of generations of people who came before you. Boring liberal representative democracy is the exception in world history. Most people in the world have never had the opportunity that you have to influence your government. Not good enough for you? Well then get off your ass and do something to make it better. The very least you can do is vote, because out of two candidates, one is always better than another. If you can’t be bothered to do even that, then I for one don’t care what you have to say about politics.

        • NSRXN@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          because out of two candidates, one is always better than another

          if neither one should have power, I’m not voting for either one

        • masquenox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          is the hard-won achievement of generations of people who came before you.

          Really? The generations of people who resisted and fought against THIS EXACT STATUS QUO would be proud of these glorified rubberstamping spectacles which only exist to legitimize elite rule?

          Really?

          Boring liberal representative democracy is the exception in world history.

          Really? So the ongoing genocide your “boring liberal representative democracy” is funding is… an exception? The history books says otherwise.

          Most people in the world have never had the opportunity that you have to influence your government.

          Lol! Do I sound like a billionaire parasite to you?

          then I for one don’t care what you have to say about politics.

          What’s the matter, liberal? Is all the cognitive dissonance starting to make you feel queesy?

            • masquenox@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              an ignorant decadent American college student.

              Those Yankee college students staging protests on US campuses are far better at “doing” democracy than all the voting you could do over a lifetime put together.

              Perhaps it’s best that you don’t try to flex about something you don’t seem to know too much about, okay?

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    They actively brought about political disaster through idiotic, self-absorbed assholery and they will be licking it up for four long fucking years.

    • masquenox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      They actively brought about political disaster

      You want to blame the people who didn’t participate in anti-democratic spectacles for the existence of said anti-democratic spectacles?

  • kandoh@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Lazy idiots, misguided idiots, deluded idiots who have made every progressive goal more difficult to achieve, just out of reach for the rest of our lives

  • Make them take the “Walk of Shame” like in the GoT.

    No fines. Just make it even easier and better process. Mail in ballots and a federal holiday for the Presidential election.

  • Soulifix@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m largely disappointed in them. The one time they were needed the most, they didn’t care to show up. Like, you do not have to be knee deep in politics to understand what’s at stake and who’s running. Take a good solid 30 minutes out of your life, to research and study the candidates, the issues and think of the future of the country’s direction if either candidate and their party got voted in.

    If they’d do just that, they’d probably have a better understanding. But they didn’t do that. They thought the 2024 election was in the bag and feel they didn’t need to do their part. Well, the results speak for themselves.

    And nothing much more needs to be said or done, they’ve sentenced themselves to the mess that’s to happen a week and a half from now. Just as much as all of the brainwashed and braindead conservatives who actively voted for fascism.

    • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      The one time they were needed the most, they didn’t care to show up.

      Are you saying the 2020 presidential election wasn’t the most important one ever? Because that’s not what everyone was saying.

  • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Perhaps they would feel more inclined to vote if we had more then two viable political parties to choose from.

    With a more representative electoral system, people would be free to vote outside the two party system with no spoiler effect. Their vote would count, even if their preference didn’t win.

    Who could possibly be against democracy? Republicans? Of course.

    How about the democratic party? What is their opinion of democracy? Will they work to ensure their constituents are represented fully? Every day that ticks by without electoral reform in blue states is another day the democrats elevate their party above the needs of the country.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      There was a choice. You failed to choose the better option, and thus must accept the worst.

      Simple-as.

  • batmaniam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Everyone get’s what they asked for. The thing about the ubiquitous trolley problem is it has clear outcomes. That’s why it works. Whatever’s happening down the track, here we are. We had a lever we didn’t pull. Best learn to live with the choice, because there was a choice.

    • callouscomic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Not true at an individual level. Where I live, no way of voting or not voting would have mattered. The same was true where I used to live years ago. In many places it’s clear my vote doesn’t matter every single time and the outcome would not have changed in most of the election categories.

      Therefore I do not actually have choice.