• Rhoeri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    They’re definitely part of the reason why we are where we are. Not the only reason, but definitely a big part of it.

    Additionally, I’ll say that their refusal to vote isn’t the protest they think it is. All it did was tell the powers that be that they trust everyone else to choose for them and that they’re fine with whoever wins.

  • DirigibleProtein@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    They don’t care who leads them and are happy to go along with whatever circumstances or rules are presented to them.

    Any problems with those circumstances or rules are their fault.

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    They probably couldn’t afford to miss a day to work, and they know from experience that neither party is going to do anything to change that.

  • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Perhaps they would feel more inclined to vote if we had more then two viable political parties to choose from.

    With a more representative electoral system, people would be free to vote outside the two party system with no spoiler effect. Their vote would count, even if their preference didn’t win.

    Who could possibly be against democracy? Republicans? Of course.

    How about the democratic party? What is their opinion of democracy? Will they work to ensure their constituents are represented fully? Every day that ticks by without electoral reform in blue states is another day the democrats elevate their party above the needs of the country.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      There was a choice. You failed to choose the better option, and thus must accept the worst.

      Simple-as.

  • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    If they wanted a certain outcome but didn’t do jacks shit, with almost no exceptions as to why they didn’t vote, and complain about it, they are getting absolutely zero, zilch, notta, nothing in the sympathy department from me.

    If you got the ability to vote, even if it’s for something as minor as what’s for dinner, and you don’t vote, don’t complain because you didn’t do anything.

  • NSRXN (insurrection)@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    I shake my head at ballots cast for elephants

    I shake my head at ballots cast for donkeys

    cuz I swear to God our leaders

    they will be the death of us

    there is no vote we can cast to set us free

    vote November second if it seems right to you

    don’t vote if tithing it just holds is down

    but tell me what we’re gonna do on November third

    to make sure there’s no government left to elect two years from now

  • batmaniam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Everyone get’s what they asked for. The thing about the ubiquitous trolley problem is it has clear outcomes. That’s why it works. Whatever’s happening down the track, here we are. We had a lever we didn’t pull. Best learn to live with the choice, because there was a choice.

    • callouscomic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Not true at an individual level. Where I live, no way of voting or not voting would have mattered. The same was true where I used to live years ago. In many places it’s clear my vote doesn’t matter every single time and the outcome would not have changed in most of the election categories.

      Therefore I do not actually have choice.

  • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Good for them. The less people who vote, the easier it is to claim correctly that the supposed rulers are illegitimate.

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m not sure about what election you’re referring to. If you mean in the recent US presidential election, most of them weren’t in a position to realistically affect the outcome anyway; they’d need to be in a swing state, a state that wasn’t already very probably going to go one way or the other.

    That being said, if they didn’t vote for the President, they probably also didn’t vote for other things on the ballot that probably affect them as well. It’s not just about electing the President.

  • Redfox8@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    They’re no worse than (possibly better than) people who voted for whichever party because their parents/newspaper taught/told them to, or because that’s who they always vote for and are too lazy, stubborn, peer pressured or insecure to change - i.e. people who claim to be politically literate but don’t actually have a clue what they’re really voting for.