• rumschlumpel@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Depends on price, taste and environmental impact compared to plant-based protein. I probably wouldn’t eat large bugs grilled hole, but I’d probably be fine with bug powder.

      • Tailz (she/her)@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Regulations that ensure my food is safe to eat and a government preventing me from eating a type of food even if it is safe to eat are two entirely different things and I’m pretty sure you knew that before trying to make a witty false equivalence

        • Oni_eyes@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Would you eat endangered species if available?

          That’s a government regulation that controls what you can consume that has nothing to do with food safety.

          • Tailz (she/her)@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Person 1: “Honey, we can’t eat chicken, beef or pork, we’ve only got crickets since the government banned all meat except for crickets”

            Person 2: “Damnit, I wish the government stopped dictating what we eat even if the food we want to eat is safe for us to eat”

            Person 3: “SO YOU MEAN TO TELL ME YOU’D EAT AN ENDANGERED SPECIES?”

            • Oni_eyes@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              OK now you’re just arguing in bad faith. You said the other guys example wasn’t equitable because it’s conflating banning a material with controlling quality. So I asked you the same concept but with a proper example and instead of responding with a coherent argument, you went with ridicule. Go play in traffic.

                • Oni_eyes@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  The point being? That it’s fine to set government regulation to protect species from being wiped out and that somehow doesn’t transfer to it being fine to regulate beef or other meats as we see them negatively affecting a vast swath of ecosystems including many of those endangered species? The harm has to be to the species being regulated and not from the species?

                  Are endangered species not also safe to eat generally?

      • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        That’s not dictating what he chooses to eat you nimrod, that’s dictating what the manufacturers are allowed to put into food

        If you can’t see the difference in that you have no business trying these infantile zingers in a public forum

        • Oni_eyes@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Shrimp and lobsters are decapods which belong in the arthropod group right alongside all of our insects. They are water insects by definition.

          It’s not at all like saying a whale is a fish because while they are both vertebrates, they split much sooner than arthropods do, and they do not share as many similar characteristics.

          It would be like saying a shark is a fish (which it is).

          • Tailz (she/her)@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Also insects are hexapods which belong to the class insecta and appeared roughly 411 million years ago. Shrimp and lobsters are decapods which predate insects. I don’t know who started this meme about shrimp and lobsters being insects but it is factually incorrect. They’re not the same thing just because they belong in the same massive phylum

            • Oni_eyes@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              Well whales and giraffes are both mammals, and since they’re classed together due to a common ancestor it’s fair to say they’re related and you could group them together.

              Just like how decapods and insects are classed with hexapods under crustacea, effectively making them related due to a common ancestor.

              So you could say giraffes (or artiodactylans) are proto whales (or cetaceans) much like you could say crustaceans are proto insects. Or insects of the sea.

      • reksas@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Are they also as different when it comes to texture and taste when eaten? Obviously assuming that the meal insect has its chitin removed first since shrimps get their shell removed too.

        • Mothra@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          The ones I’ve eaten didn’t have as much meat, because they’re small. Also, the exoskeleton of insects is a lot thinner than that of crustaceans. You don’t need to remove it. You remove the legs and wings if any, as in the case of crickets. The texture and taste is nothing like seafood either, at least not mealworms, crickets or ants. Crickets are more like dry crispy beef, mealworms are similar to popcorn in taste, ants are like a strange peppery/citrus thing. You don’t really feel much meaty texture with small insects, it’s more like crispy or crunchy stuff. At least, fried that is.

  • hark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    No. Plenty of delicious plants to eat. There is no need to eat disgusting goo in shells.

  • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I would eat well cooked insects even if mammal meat is not banned. Even more so if the environmental benefit is demonstrated.

    • YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Bro, I had BBQ flavored cricket snacks one time just for the novelty. They were actually really good, of not loaded up on salt. But it was this random candy store in a dying mall and haven’t found them since. Also got a scorpion lollipop one time, also really good, but was more sugar than scorpion.

      I would absolutely eat the fuck out some cricket balls with parsley, onion, and garlic!

  • TotallyNotSpez@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’ve been a vegetarian for the past 24 years, but if I ate meat, and it was banned, I’d defo try insects. I’m actually curious about how they taste. Like friend ants, crickets, and so on.

    • Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I would eat insects right now if they were cooked by an amateur. But that’s just me personally and I’m built different.

    • Mothra@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      @[email protected]

      I once went to a museum and they had a chef preparing some insects. I asked him for how long he’d been cooking insects, and he kind of glanced sideways and said he had no fucking clue of what he was doing. He just got the gig to cook the insects for museum visitors and just rolled with it. They were good though, there were crickets, ants and mealworms.

      • cam_i_am@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Protein is protein right? I’m sure any half decent chef could figure out how to make insects tasty with a little trial and error.

  • zxqwas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    What’s the ruling on cheese? If I’m not allowed cheese I’m starting a revolution.

    Jokes aside if I tried to I don’t expect it would take much to overcome the mental barrier against eating them, provided they taste good and are not weird to chew.

    • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I expect that synthetic cheese based on actual casein (but made with bacteria etc. instead of mammals) will be fully market-ready and relatively affordable long before we get relatively affordable synthetic meat (the kind that’s the based on cow/pig/etc. cells). It’s mostly a homogenous mass, after all, which is a much smaller issue than getting the texture of steak right. IDK how affordable ‘relatively affordable’ is going to be, though.