• Deceptichum@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Look it’s cool that you’re in a philosophical moral club, but don’t go around defending religion by calling yourself a religion and saying ‘look at me as an example of a good religion’ when you don’t actually hold religious/supranatural beliefs.

    And if you do hold such beliefs, don’t claim you accept reality.

    • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 hours ago

      You know, you can just say “supernaturalism” instead of “religion”. The two are not synonymous. You can have religion without supernaturalism, such as non-theistic Satanism and some forms of Buddhism. You can have supernaturalism without religion, which describes many New-Agers. I’m sure you’ve heard people say “I’m spiritual, but not religious”, and that’s what they mean by that. There are people who believe in souls and reincarnation and stuff like that, but they don’t have a religion built around it.

      In the case of non-theistic Satanism, there is a moral code, a set of beliefs, and a community of people with shared values, as well as holidays and rituals. Just nothing supernatural.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Look, I actually kind of agree. And this is why I will never call myself a Satanist.

      However, I think it’s foolish to ignore the work that the TST does in fighting for the separation of religion and government.