• disevani@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    8 hours ago

    TL;DR

    • Developers of open-source Android apps, including NewPipe, have begun warning users about Google’s upcoming sideloading restrictions.
    • NewPipe’s developers refuse to comply with Google’s proposed verification rules.
    • The app has started to inform users of ways to bypass hurdles, including the proposed 24-hour lockout period before installing “unverified” apps.

    Also; fuck Google.

    • Cryxtalix@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      40 minutes ago

      Graphene is insanely good. It’s even better than classic custom roms, since you can actually easily install google play. I’m avoiding Google’s stupid crackdowns, getting additional security, all while having most of my stuff still work.

      Most apps just work. My games and paid apps still work. Google wallet doesn’t work, but I just used my physical cards. McDonald’s app doesn’t work, but that might’ve been a benefit to my health.

      Overall, couldn’t believe a security focused product had such good usability.

    • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Honestly, this still worries me. There is no telling how many apps I rely on will evaporate over the next year. Several devs have already announced sunsetting their projects.

      There are a number of projects that rely on on user installs, either because they are small passion projects (it costs money to be on the Play Store), or because they provide a function that is not permitted by Google Play. Without a vibrant community outside of the play store supporting them, it’s hard to see how they will all survive.

      • Mountainaire@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        What if a proxy dev account offered to put up a bunch of devs’ apps on the store? Could at least some of them be satisfied by pseudo-anonymity?

        • Lichtblitz@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          This is a double edged sword. You risk hostile takeover if the Dev has bad intentions and you risk suddenly being off the store if the Dev account gets blocked for one of the other apps. For me it would not be worth the hassle.

    • LedgeDrop@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I’m confused. Has Graphene said they’re not going to comply with Google’s policy for installing 3rd party apps?

      • Zak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        5 hours ago

        The policy is mandated for “certified” Android devices. Those have Google apps preloaded and pass Google’s remote attestation.

        GrapheneOS is not certified and has no plans to be.

      • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        This crap from Google requires Google Services (Play, etc) - OS’s like Graphene and Lineage don’t have those services pre-installed.

        • Nexus@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I’m not a GrapheneOS user (yet). However, as I understand it GrapheneOS does not obligate the installation of “Google Play Services” but does permit the installation of the service in a sandboxed environment (or separate profile).