![[image] I've seen this a lot online lately, this notion that cars are the only solution for all disabilities. I wasn't aware of a term for it, so I made my own.](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/05a0b803-fc62-444a-846e-5c8769a4c893.webp){kind=link}
Car Savior Complex (noun)
Pronunciation: [kahr seyv-yer kuhm-pleks]
Definition: The Car Savior Complex refers to a mindset in which individuals exclusively prioritize automobiles as the sole solution for mobility challenges faced by people with disabilities, dismissing alternative modes of transportation. Rooted in a lack of awareness and understanding of diverse disability experiences, this complex manifests when there is an insistence that cars are the only viable means of transportation for all individuals with disabilities, irrespective of their unique needs and abilities.
Characteristics:
- Exclusivity: Belief that cars are the only legitimate and practical mobility solution for people with disabilities, disregarding the varied requirements and preferences of individuals within the disabled community.
- Limited Accessibility Consideration: Ignoring the accessibility barriers faced by individuals who may find it challenging to enter, exit, or operate traditional vehicles due to their disability.
- Neglect of Public Transportation: Dismissing the potential benefits of accessible public transportation, shared mobility services, or active transportation methods, which can offer viable options for many people with disabilities.
- Overlooking Environmental Impact: Disregarding the environmental consequences of overreliance on cars, such as pollution and congestion, in favor of prioritizing personal vehicles as the default choice for all disabled individuals.
- Ignoring Socioeconomic Factors: Failing to acknowledge economic constraints that may prevent some individuals with disabilities from owning or maintaining a private vehicle, limiting their mobility options.
Criticism: The Car Savior Complex is criticized for perpetuating a one-size-fits-all approach to mobility solutions, which fails to account for the diverse needs, abilities, and preferences of people with disabilities. This narrow perspective hampers the development of inclusive transportation policies and infrastructure, hindering progress toward accessible and equitable mobility for all.
Usage: The term “Car Savior Complex” is utilized in discussions related to urban planning, disability rights, and transportation advocacy to challenge the assumption that cars should be the exclusive focus of efforts to enhance mobility for people with disabilities.
Example Sentence: “The city’s insistence on promoting a car-centric infrastructure reveals a Car Savior Complex, neglecting the needs of disabled residents who could benefit from a more inclusive approach, incorporating accessible public transportation and pedestrian-friendly pathways.”
Good job! I find it hilarious because I am disabled and can ride a bike just fine. Not all disabilities stop you from riding a bike.
But as you point out, public transit looks to me like the most accessible means of transportation, not cars.
Yeah, my sister had her driver’s license suspended last year because of medical reasons, but she can still walk or ride a bike or ride public transit with zero issue. An electric bike has been a godsend for her in her hilly, car-dependent neighborhood, although there’s still a nigh-complete lack of dedicated bike infrastructure. It’s long bothered me how people who defend car dependency implicitly believe people like you or my sister don’t deserve the right to safe, independent mobility and will ignore your existence because they only care about using the vague notion of disability as an excuse to not have to rethink our car-dependent society.
I’ve got nothing more to add here, just wanted to join the canuck comment chain.
Also hand pedal bikes + seated scooters. I saw this disabled dude on a scooter ripping it down the bike path going 30km/h the other day.
Yeah, the $2-10k entrance fee is the fucked part.
Source: Am disabled, can’t ride a bike or scooter, do require the use of crutch or cane, kinda hate this post.
The entry fee for car dependency is significantly higher 🤷♀️
Of course it is…mostly because you can use it no matter the weather outside…and you can use it to travel much further distances… do I really need to explain why a car is a car and why cars are more expensive? But, I can find a used car cheaper than I’ve found used/new hand pedal bikes…
Can’t imagine spending 5k on something that can’t be my main mode of transport…
So, fuck your able-bodied mindset?
You wouldn’t have to invest in a scooter or a car if your region has accessible transit.
Oh man, what the fuck is going on in this group?
I was responding to the thread about a disabled guy on a scooter and offered a reasonable answer as to why not all disabled folks would be able to go this route easily. Especially if it can’t replace their current means of transportation, and costs THE FUCKING SAME IF NOT MORE.
Yes, I want easily accessible transit. Yes, I hate the idea of everyone needing a fucking car to do anything. Yes, I believe it is the duty of the municipality to create efficient and non discriminating means of transport.
The shit I’m responding to, is the capitalist fix to disabled movement. Anything thats made for people with “different” bodies, is going to be like 5x the price of a normal thing and probably still the quality of the lowest tiered object out there. (Hand pedal bikes being the prime example.)
Fuck. I knew the fuck cars group would have some ignorant able-bodied ideals, but this shit is getting silly.
Fuck you, too. Just for making fucks at people. In fact, fuck you twice.
Technically, I said, “Fuck your able-bodied mindset”, never said “fuck you.”
Until now, fuck you, you stupid ableist-fuck.
I haven’t said anything ablist, I’ve merely objected to your needlessly hostile and antagonistic tone. Calling me ablist without any basis is a transparent attempt to insulate yourself from criticism, you fragile dink.
AKTCUALLY, “technically” I never said you said “fuck you”, I said you made fucks at people. And you did. So don’t pull that “technically” shit, just gather up all your fucking fucks and fuck off with them.
I guess one could retort with, “You’re right, but ending of your opening statement with ‘too’ has an implication of a previous ‘fuck, you’…” or something along the lines of, “if you find my tone hostile maybe you’re oblivious to your own ableist views and how rampant of an issue it is.” Or possibly “why the fuck do you find the word fuck so offensive you sensitive twat?”
But, maybe you’re right…in fact…you’re right. Wasting my time responding at this point, has made me a loser. And in turn, you, a winner.
You win, jerkface. Take the internet points, and have a good life. Best of luck.
deleted by creator