I miss traditional message boards. No karma, no sorting algorithms, you just get new topics on top and replies are sorted oldest to newest.

You can have forum threads that go on for decades, but Lemmy’s default sorting system quickly sweeps older content away. I’m aware you can mimic the forum format by selecting the “chat” option in a thread and sorting by old, and you can sort posts by “latest comment” which replicates the old-school forum experience pretty well, but nobody does it that way, so the community behaves in the manner facilitated by the default sorting algorithm that prioritizes new content over old but still relevant content.

I also notice that I don’t pay attention to usernames on Lemmy (or Reddit back when I was on it). They’re just disembodied thoughts floating through the ether. On message boards, I get to know specific users, their personalities and preferences and ups and downs. I notice when certain users don’t post for a while and miss them if they’re gone for too long.

EDIT: given this is my most upvoted post on here to date I’d say the answer is yes.

  • arcterus@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    They still exist, they’re just kind of rare. There’s even federated forums like NodeBB. I actively read stuff on SpaceBattles, Sufficient Velocity, etc. It’s admittedly difficult to find something with absolutely no like/karma system, but for instance the hellhole known as GameFAQs still exists.

  • Credibly_Human@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I feel like forums sucked too because of the lack of sorting.

    They just don’t scale well to many users. Once you hit a certain number of users, without some method to sort, its just information overload.

    Hell, forum threads that are too long inevitably go completely off the rails and become off topic troves.

    I think there has to be a better intermediate format, like perhaps a mix of systems, but I think the main thing that makes reddit-likes suck, is their systems of governance.

    Something I realized very quickly with lemmy for instance, is that its the not at all benevolent dictator positions where the main incentives for people choosing to spend their time in mod positions still remains to impose their will, whether that be their opinion or power over others speech.

    There is something at its core which is wrong with this system at scale. It allows for mods to collect up critical masses of people before then knowing that due to that critical mass they have captive audiences where there is high friction to leave or start something else.

    Lemmy has a very bandaid “solution” for this in that there can be multiple of any given community/subreddit, but they all suffer from the fact that whatever a moderator wants is what happens, and even in the worst case scenarios, that is just moved up one layer to admins, who are incentived to appear as hands off as possible on moderators, lest they get turned on by the people who “help” them.

    Reddit sucks because of a lot of other profit driven reasons, but I think this is the main structural problem.

    Forums have this problem too by the way, but its just that forums are so separate and so bad at handling massive amounts of casual users, that they run into this far less.

  • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I miss dial-up BBSes that had nothing more than a wall of text, like SASSy was in Montreal. Single line system, no user names or logins, 7 bit ASCII, no colors, no sound, no files.

    You just kept dialing until you got the line. Then you’d download all the lines from the last line you left off, then either typed in your stuff or pasted it. If you were super lucky, the sysop would barge in while you were typing.

    It was great. Really felt like technology and people mixing well, we even eventually met IRL with "GT"s, Get Togethers.

    I miss the sense of fun and adventure and my youth. Especially my youth.

        • PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          It’s not to be taken literally - like other posts in the thread, it’s just using language and terminology that was common in the late 90s and early 00s when bulletin boards and forums were in their heyday 😊

      • early_riser@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I find it interesting how thread necromancy can be encouraged on some forums but discouraged on others depending on the local culture. On the pro necro side I can see people wanting to maintain and consolidate discussions rather than constantly rehash them. On the anti necro side I can see how necroing a controversial thread could re-ignite a long extinguished flame war.

        • klangcola@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          The other day i necrod a nearly 3 year old forumthread with some new information. A few hours later the person from 3 years ago came back and thanked me because the new information helped them. Sometimes nercomancy is good :)

        • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          I am split on this.

          If you allow it, then you get eevblog sort of posts where there are 1000+ comments over 5 years in 50 pages that switch topics so regularly that every 2-5 pages should be entirely seperate posts and reading them because of wanting to find information on the title topic is completely useless.

          On the other hand, sometimes an issue will become stale and someone will comment with an update or solution to a problem and get chastised for “necroing” and sometimes their comment with a solution deleted.

        • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          If old discussions have no value, then the forum is topical and shallow. If old discussions have value then they are deep and go beyond today’s thpught-pablum.

  • Canaconda@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Upvote/Downvote/likes is the cancer that ruined it all. Before that one actually had to speak in support or against any given ideas. Now people can assume anything is true/false based on an arbitrary engagement number.

      • Credibly_Human@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        It absolutely does. Your post gets hidden, and you have a higher likelyhood of moderator interaction. It is less punishing though.

    • [deleted]@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      That lead to a lot more back and forth arguments as people had to get in the last word or people chiming in with agreements because that was the only way to see if multiple people agreed.

      I like forums for informational discussions that don’t have a ton of back and forth. Forums are better for hobbies in my experience.

    • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I remember a couple forums had a “thank” feature or something similar that would show, with your username, your approval for a post without having to make an additional post about it. No downvotes though, you had to speak up to be a hater. I think that was a fine middle ground.

    • bluGill@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Upvote-downvote is a great reaction to all the trolls. combined withan algorithm they can surface the good stuff and alert moderators to garbage. Algorithms are wrong in many places, but that is the implementation that is bad not the idea itself

      Lemmys culture of downvoting well written things you disagree with is a problem though. So long as nothing is done about that you can’t make a good algorithm. idealy you would have the guts to upvote things you disagree with, but at least we need people to stop using downvote to disagree - respond with reason if you disagree.

      • [deleted]@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Lemmys culture of downvoting well written things you disagree with is a problem though

        A well written post that is completely wrong, possibly offensive, and a net negative to the conversation doesn’t deserve immunity to down votes just because of how it was written.

        we need people to stop using downvote to disagree - respond with reason if you disagree.

        A down vote conveys disagreement and if everyone who disagrees responds then there will be complaints of people getting dog piled. Down votes means letting off some steam for some people, sometimes as a counter to a crappy post or comment getting positive votes they don’t think it deserves.

        There are also a very tiny number of times that I have seen down votes on something that didn’t deserve it. Overall the vast, vast majority of votes are up votes even for stuff that doesn’t deserve it and a few down votes doesn’t ruin anything. The system works extremely well, even if people have a wide variety of thresholds for up voting and down voting.

            • ultranaut@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              It’s vague on purpose, what contributes is entirely contextual. It would take a lot to explain in detail and I don’t see a reason to spend the time when a high level summary gets the idea across.

      • Canaconda@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Upvote-downvote is a great reaction to all the trolls.

        You’re thinking moderators.

          • Midnight Wolf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            If only we had a system where anyone could report anyone… Maybe have a link that says ‘report’… And we could have it on every topic, and every reply, so it would be easy to do… And after a number of reports by users of sufficient account age and in good standing, the reported comment would be moved to a quarantine so if the admins are unavailable, the forum can operate on autopilot to keep the users safe…

            Ah well, nobody would ever implement that wild idea… sigh

      • Credibly_Human@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Upvote-downvote is a great reaction to all the trolls. combined withan algorithm they can surface the good stuff and alert moderators to garbage.

        They create a similarly big problem though. Every group has a natural tendency towards members increasingly feeling like they are walking on eggshells with ever more precise purity tests, and any dissent gets hidden.

        Lemmys culture of downvoting well written things you disagree with is a problem though. So long as nothing is done about that you can’t make a good algorithm.

        Well written is subjective. Something can be long and filled with evidence and still be gibberish or in bad faith.

        You also have to have a limit of how much effort you are willing to spend in any given conflict.

        Furthermore, trying to change human behaviour in that way rather than finding a system that better accomplishes the goal seems like an impossible goal.

    • early_riser@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yes, I also think the voting system can make things worse in some ways. On a traditional forum the one and only way to show you like or dislike something was to leave a reply. With a voting system a lot of the “engagement” is just a number that moves up or down. It’s also way too easy to slip into the unhealthy mindset of mining karma because monkey brain like number go up. Granted on Lemmy it’s a bit better since you don’t have a single cumulative score.

  • Skeezix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    you just get new topics on top and replies are sorted oldest to newest.

    you can do that here too.

    • early_riser@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      And I point that out in the OP, but my point is it’s not the default so the community culture doesn’t encourage long term discussion. I’ve tried making a single megathread for all my content on a particular community but it never went anywhere because, to everyone else who wasn’t sorting posts and comments as described above, the post just dropped off the front page after a day or two never to be seen again.

    • solrize@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      No you can’t. Only the top level comments are sorted, not the nested ones.

  • birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Might be handy if Lemmy allowed to hide karma altogether. You could still up-/downvote (depending on the instance, only upvoting allowed). Or places where karma is disabled by default.

    • nocturne@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Some apps, Mlem is one, allows you to hide scores. You can also remove the up/down vote buttons should you choose.

  • SlartyBartFast@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I was just thinking, the optimal “reddit”-type site should have been just a big list of links to different forums, and nothing more

  • Secret Music 🎵 [they/them]@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Personally I think that this Reddit style is an upgrade design wise. And as far as recognising people goes, I’m using an app that lets you tag users (Summit) and this has gone quite a long way. It’s also made the start paying attention to other usernames to an extent, so if I notice that someone often posts content that vibes with me or whatever, I can give them a ⭐ or something.

    What I do miss from the days when forums were dominant is that people stayed in their lanes a little more. A particular forum or board or even thread is for a particular topic, and people who derailed or came along just to insult and shit on everything were dealt with, without this crying about ‘free speech’.

    Current day social media has spawned a bunch of people who feel entitled to say whatever they want to whoever they want in any space they want, and cry about blue haired SJWs or something if there’s consequences. And they act like the internet used to be this place where forum moderators didn’t rule with an iron fist, or like the ‘real world’ is somewhere that you can behave this way without being punched in the face.

    I just think a lot of problems could be solved if jocks went back to discussing sportsball and cars and stayed in their lanes, instead of considering themselves to be experts on biology and sociology and vaccines. There’s a fine line between ‘free speech’ and letting the inmates run the asylum, and the last 10 years have proven that.

    Basically what I miss from the forum days is that back then, the conspiracy theorist idiots would’ve probably been banned, and would’ve stayed in the fringes of society instead of going mainstream.

    • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Current day social media has spawned a bunch of people who feel entitled to say whatever they want to whoever they want in any space they want, and cry about blue haired SJWs or something if there’s consequences. And they act like the internet used to be this place where forum moderators didn’t rule with an iron fist, or like the ‘real world’ is somewhere that you can behave this way without being punched in the face.

      Block them. Why do you need someone or something else to do this work for you? Curate your feed. If you arent seeing what you like… thats a you problem.

      • Secret Music 🎵 [they/them]@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Why do you need someone or something else to do this work for you?

        Lmao way to turn that on me, good one. I’m literally talking about the people who can’t just scroll past or block something without needing to act like it was forced on them. The people who campaign to cancel Netflix over 1 show out of 1000s that they could’ve just scrolled past. The people who live in an era where you can follow exactly what you want online, and watch and listen to exactly what you want on streaming, but still complain about having the wOkE aGeNdA shoved down their throats because they’re incapable of wiping their asses (or they think it’s gay).

        Trust me, I’m not the one with the problem of inserting my business everywhere that I don’t belong. I’m not going anywhere near incel forums, or manosphere support groups, or to tell people how fucking stupid their hobbies are. And knowing these people, I’d get banned quickly if I did because they’re the biggest pearl clutchers of all. This problem is entirely one sided and caused by certain types of people who are more emboldened than ever these days.

        • Flamekebab@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          I hate the notion that fringe lunatics have opinions that are just as valuable as anyone else’s. Push that fucking Overton Window back to somewhere sane. We do need people shutting these disruptive idiots down. The answer is not just to act like they’re not there.

          Has that approach worked on any bully ever?

  • zergtoshi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I still use them, because they’re awesome.
    They’re not gone, although there are quite a bit fewer than some time ago.

      • zergtoshi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        What about https://www.kiaevforums.com/?
        As you can see it’s a kind of niche forum for EV made by Kia, but there are several of these niche forums.
        Most often they’re not very crowded, but I like them being more calm than some other places on the internet.

        I have some more of these, but they are really only helpful/interesting, if you fit into that niche and in that case you’ll find them easily through search engines.

  • Retro_unlimited@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I remember back in 2007,2008 etc I had an app on my phone that had tons of forums on it. I spent years on that app reading, learning, screen shorting, so much information. It was my favorite app. Few years later I get a new phone and can’t find that app anymore. There was a woodworking forum, electricians forum, welding forum, weed forum, and so many others. All in one single app.

    Couldn’t find any of the forums. Depressing.

  • Lee@retrolemmy.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I like forums, but maybe I’m part of the problem. I’ve read a forum obsessively for years without registering an account. Even when I have an account, I rarely post/comment. I’ve been reading Lemmy almost daily for over a year before registering an account and don’t reply much even with an account. Decentralization starts with individuals, so I’m going to try to add signal to the fediverse.

    I generally prefer the traditional flat forum UI with oldest first, but that’s mostly a client issue. The problem though is if others are using a different UI the conversation may flow differently (think threaded vs flat forums).

    • early_riser@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      The problem though is if others are using a different UI the conversation may flow differently

      Yes, that’s exactly what I mean. You CAN reacreate the message board experience on Lemmy pretty faithfully by sorting posts by latest comment (like the bumping system of forums) and setting comments to “chat” which flattens the comment tree, and sorting oldest to newest, but nobody does that do the community doesn’t develop around it.

  • Geth@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I prefer and always have preferred a vote system like we have here. Forums made paralel conversations impossible to follow, gave a bigger voice to trolls and made finding information in big threads difficult. I absolutely hated the common answer to a question being “search the forum”. I already have Jared, the search function is trash and the information is scattered and outdated.

    What aspect I do miss is the fact that threads stayed relevant for more than 24hrs. I think a combination of the two systems would work for a forum 2.0, where ranking is based on activity and votes, so a post gets pushed back up in ranking if it’s still active and relevant, instead of just taking raw votes and age in considerarion, but also the comments within are grouped in conversations based on who replied to who and can move up and down based on activity and age.

    • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Except vote systems are abused to hell. Dissenting opinions are down voted into oblivion and we end up with the echo chamber.

      I spent a lot of time on the ebaumsworld forums in the early 2000s, and it was your classic shitshow. Not a huge amount of traffic, though, so you could have conversations, but you’d leave, and come back the next day, and sometimes you’d have pages of nonsense to read through.

      Then, they introduced rep, and it was such a shitshow. Users conspired together to abuse it, because that’s how it goes, except now, instead of late night Skype sessions, it’s bots, and marketing, and PR.

      I guess the problem was and always is, when there’s too many people, it ruins things.

      • Flamekebab@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        I guess the problem was and always is, when there’s too many people, it ruins things.

        This is the thing when people talk about the Fediverse’s traffic compared to Reddit. To me it’s very much a feature. I don’t think trying to get everyone and their dog on the same platform is a particularly good idea!

    • mirshafie@europe.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Exactly, threads that get new activity should be bumped. Maybe they don’t need to be super-visible for people who ignored the thread in the first place, but they could at least go to the top-50 posts.

      I think it would be cool if conversations that link to the same URL are all automatically grouped, so that reposts just become bumps with a new context/title.

      • early_riser@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        You can sort posts on Lemmy by “latest comment” which mirrors the bumping method of forums. That’s how I do it. My complaint was that people always use the default so the community never grows around the style facilitated by the older forum method. Maybe if individual communities could force a default or at least have a community specific default that could be changed per user that would help.

  • Waldelfe@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I miss them, too. I was a member of a writing forum. There were maybe 30-40 very active members. You’d come to know them even if you didn’t know their real names. But you’d read from Flower123 in one post and then there was always a category for smalltalk and you’d recognize Flower123 when they wrote about being sick or their hobby. We even had regional meetings for a big poetry forums where 10/15 came to a café. There was just a feeling of being a community.

    Unfortunately I am not sure if this would even work today, even if we replicated the forumstructure 1:1. People are more used to consuming media online. You can see that here in Lemmy, too. Many people complain about the lack of content, but not many post or engage. People want to consume, not take an active role in a community. The only reason reddit still kind of works, apart from the bot content, is that it has a giant, international user base so it still feels like a lot of content even if only 10% are very active.

    The whole internet culture has shifted from a light-hearted playground to a consumption-based minefield. People use the internet for different reasons. It’s a huge difference if I come home from school, ask my parents to use the internet for an hour, go on that one poetry forum that is 80% of my internet activities and interact with the same 30-40 people every day or if I have the internet with me every second of the day and have an endless supply of consumable content that is enjoyable without interacting. People don’t really feel like they can/should be an active participant in the discourse anymore unless it’s by posting their own, standalone content on platforms like tiktok. And then it’s not really an interaction with other people, it’s more like everybody is yelling into nothingness.