You’re on .world, an American hosted instance. As long as you remove what is actively requested by the government in a reasonable amount of time you cannot be legally held liable for any content hosted. This includes piracy or CSAM.
If no one reports the content and d you are not made aware of it, you cannot be held liable. We’ve been through this, meta and Twitter did all the hard work hashing this out in court against the riaa. Why reject their hard work instead of using the same rules that protect them?
You’re on .world, an American hosted instance. As long as you remove what is actively requested by the government in a reasonable amount of time you cannot be legally held liable for any content hosted. This includes piracy or CSAM.
If no one reports the content and d you are not made aware of it, you cannot be held liable. We’ve been through this, meta and Twitter did all the hard work hashing this out in court against the riaa. Why reject their hard work instead of using the same rules that protect them?
The ToS would like to disagree with you.
Specifically:
The website and the agreement will be governed by and construed per the laws of the following countries and/or states: