Every time I hear someone say ‘eh’ in a questioning tone or to mean ‘um actually’ I lose my shit. Or even just to play something down.

Like I literally come to hate the person instantly. Its a very strong feeling on a very small sound.

Instant downvotes if I see it on Lemmy too. HATE IT.

How about all y’all?

  • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    “no offense” then proceeds to offend said person, or people using the word “YALL” how did it become popular when 15-20years ago and was considered unintelligent. Also people saying “entitled to thier own opinions” but end up saying thier own opinions matter more.

    • Blisterexe@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      I use y’all because my native language has a plural you and english doesn’t I use y’all because it’s the most neutral plural you english has. I suspect that’s part of the reason why it’s over-represented online, esl learners.

    • ThunderComplex@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      I don’t rember where I heard (must’ve been a TV show) it but it always stuck with me when a character said “yes offense”.

  • otacon239@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I tend not to boil people down to their habits. They likely don’t know it bothers you and don’t know why they’ve made an enemy of you. Their reaction to me bringing it up will absolutely determine how I feel about them, though. I can teach myself to get past almost anything if I can justify their action in good faith.

    • Maeve@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      I often find my strong reactions tells me more about something within myself I need to find and address more than it says anything about the annoyance.

  • NoWay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    “Let that sink in…”

    All I think about is what does the sink want, and why is it outside? Any point they were trying to make is now a joke to me. Better to say “think about that for a minute.”

    • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Often used after saying something that they think is some big profound revelation. No, I was able to understand it all just fine in real time.

  • Vupware@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Instead of “et cetera”, the speaker says something akin to “dut da da”. Drives me crazy!

  • Perspectivist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I don’t hate anything. That word seems to mean something different to most people than it does to me. I’m careful with my language, and hate describes such an extreme emotion that I’ve yet to encounter anything I’d genuinely feel that way toward - except maybe cancer.

    There are, however, things people say that I do dislike. Not just the loose use of the word hate, but also trendy phrases and slogans like “fuck around and find out.” What bothers me about those is that if you’ve already seen two people use the same phrase, it’s already old and no longer clever or funny - it’s just recycled noise at that point.

  • SelfHigh5@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    “It is what it is.”

    If you don’t have anything valuable to add, say nothing. Like, silence is okay.

  • Toes♀@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    “Let’s agree to disagree”

    This solves nothing, it just equates to a polite way of saying I’m done talking to you.

      • klemptor@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        This argument dates back to the '80s, so we’re talking TOS & TNG vs the original trilogy. I would argue they’re not even really the same genre. Star Trek is proper scifi. Star Wars is action/adventure with scifi dressing.

        I’m biased because I love Star Trek. But also I like Star Wars. It doesn’t have to be either-or, especially because it’s apples vs oranges.

          • klemptor@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            De-umbrage yourself - in Star Trek lore the world was a complete mess in 2025. The future Roddenberry envisioned could still happen, we just won’t be alive to see it. Which I agree is a bummer! :(

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Sometimes you have to back the fuck up on an unproductive argument. I don’t like it either, but it’s often an honorable way out for both parties.

      Very close friend and neighbor was arguing with me about 01/06, an event that gave me PTSD-lite. It came to the point that we either dropped it or threw hands. Still, I refused to shake his hand on “agree to disagree”.

      • Sparkles@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Mine is finding a natural pause and kindly “Ah, darn, I have a (thing to do) but it’s been lovely chatting!”

  • 315am@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    “I call it as I see it.”

    “I’m just very straightforward and honest.”

    No, you’re a prick. That’s what you are.

  • yermaw@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I literally dislike it whenever anyone uses the word literally when they clearly mean figuratively.

    Its just extra syllables to lie to me.

    • FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      As I said in another comment, it isn’t just using it incorrectly that’s annoying, it’s also using it unnecessarily. People use “literally” for emphasis in sentences where no adverb is needed. It should only be used if you are clarifying that you mean literally when the sentence could otherwise be interpreted as figurative

      • blackbrook@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        It’s just become a stylistic habit. People do it in imitation of what they hear everyone else do. This actually makes it even more annoying to me, though I know this is just instinctive human behavior.

    • tal@olio.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      There’s this process in language where intensifiers — words that amplify the strength of the meaning of the rest of the phrase — tend to become used in areas that they aren’t really truly appropriate in and thus “weaken” in meaning.

      So, for example, “awesome” once truly meant “awe-inspiring”, but it’s been used enough in weaker senses the past several decades here in California that it doesn’t really mean that any more. It just means “very good” now.

      I don’t think that the Brits do that with “awesome” — or at least not as much — but they like to use “colossally” in a similar way.

      The above Wikipedia link has a list of intensifiers, including “literally”, and you can probably recognize a bunch of them that have “weakened”.

  • kubok@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    “Give something 110%”

    Fuck no! 100% is the max. Even that is often too much to ask. Also, what’s in it for me? Your appreciation huh? Well fuck you.

    “I have a challenge for you”.

    No you don’t. You have a problem and want to make it mine. Piss off.

    • HubertManne@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      I am going through peoples replies sorta laughing to myself but what you have is the closest thing to something that irritates me. honestly 110 is like all the think out of the box bussiness speak to actualize externalities and such.

  • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    People who talk in buzz words as if this makes them insightful and intelligent and think others who don’t are ignorant and stupid.

    I think ‘emotional intelligence’ is the one that has really bothered me the most really. It also can’t even be quantified but everyone goes around talking about how ‘high’ theirs is and how they only want to be with other people who are ‘emotionally intelligent’ as they are. It’s just another way of saying you don’t like someone because they don’t feel the way you do about whatever thing.

  • porksnort@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    “It is what it is.”

    It infuriates me because it is usually said by a person so mentally lazy that they are causing problems for others. You can’t say it is what it is unless you can tell me what ‘it’ is!

    It’s not ‘acceptance’, it’s spiritual bypassing at best and it makes me want to puke.

  • Darohan@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    “Common sense” when it actually means “something you would know if you’d lived my exact life”. There are very few things in this world that are actually “common sense”, and to be honest the whole concept should just be removed from cultures in which it is present.