• Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    47 minutes ago

    Likes: the small community, traditional forum vibe. No ads, no oppressive corporate hand to keep things advertiser-friendly. Interests and views tend to align, but I can have a healthy disagreement on many issues with most users here. Only a few famous borderline trollish users that aren’t fun to chat with, most overt trolls are quickly dealt with.

    Dislikes: heavy use of downvoting simply unpopular opinions (a mild annoyance). Difficult to pick between posting in a rarely active niche community and a very active but general community (sometimes I just crosspost). The threat of centralization, with Lemmy.world and Lemmy.ml having by far the largest communities (I would like to see more active communities spread across sites, though I make an effort sometimes to comment on different servers). Some big features I’d like to see that still seem far from implementation, such as multi-communities.

  • xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Dislike: every post inevitably has someone complaining about capitalism, Trump, police, Musk, …

  • ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I dislike that Lemmy is such a left-wing echo chamber. Reddit had a much wider variety of opinions being voiced openly; on Lemmy, there’s almost none. It doesn’t take long to figure out what’s acceptable to say here and what isn’t. It’s a kind of self-gaslighting because it can make you feel like the opinions of the average Lemmy user represent the wider population when that couldn’t be further from the truth.

    Also, there are almost no blue-collar workers here, and most discussions revolve around office jobs and big city life.

  • i_dont_want_to@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Like

    Editable titles

    “All” here vs other social media is much better

    It’s more likely that arguments are civil. There are still quite a few venomous arguments but I’ve noticed that it it proportionally less.

    On Reddit or Facebook, if you didn’t like a group you left and made your own. If you didn’t like the admins, tough shit. Here, if you don’t like the admins, you can use a different instance.

    Likes and dislikes are separate, and are in some cases viewable who submit them. I feel like this keeps people a little more honest.

    I like the modlog and transparency. It’s so much easier that when someone complains about unfair mod action, to see if they are in the right or exaggerating.

    There is an “end” to Lemmy. There isn’t just infinite content to scroll through.

    Dislike

    Smaller user base means that niches that Reddit filled just aren’t here.

    There is an “end” to Lemmy. There isn’t just infinite content to scroll through.

    Neutral

    The types of common negative personalities here are different from that of Reddit. Reddit has more misogyny, classism, antinatalists, and obnoxious atheists. (As opposed to the chill atheists.) Lemmy has quite a few people that are pretty shitty to those that are disabled or cannot get out of some situations. If you cannot work towards the greater good without any rest, can’t escape a bad situation, or can’t just extend yourself further, you are trash. There are also more fringe beliefs here. I do like it because of the different perspectives, even if I very strongly disagree. (It makes me think!) Unfortunately we still have the dumbass arguments about generations but you can’t have it all.

    • bamfic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Like: Long-ass posts. Mastodon has a ridiculous character limit; lemmy doesn’t seem to have any. Dislike: Long-ass posts. Jesus people, the rants and drawn-out arguments.

      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I was going to quote you saying arguements are civil, and then mock argue with you in an absurd way. But then I thought it wasn’t clear that I was being absurd and joking, and you might think I was actually toxic argueing with you. So I turned up the absurd.

        Somehow this ended with me giving you a lapdance as I insulted you. It made ME laugh, but I think instead of coming across as funny, it was just confusing.

        …also erotic.

  • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Decentrilization is both a blessing and a curse.

    If there’s an issue you can make your own community with blackjack, and hookers.

    But at the same time these communities never seem to get super big (minus a few) and if you’re subscribed to both there’s not a good way to deduplicate the posts. So 5 communities post the same thing (or one person posts them in 5) sometimes you see all 5 side by side.

  • Hawke@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Like: decentralization and a renaissance of the old- school dream of what the Internet should be.

    Dislike: media bias fact checker bot spamming every damn post. Power tripping mods.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I’m still unclear what the purpose of that bot is, and why everyone hates it. It always just says bias checking is unavailable right now.

      • Hawke@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I hate it because it shows up everywhere and adds nothing of value while displaying busy formatted text. If it lately shows even less meaningful content, that barely seems possible.

    • sho@ani.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Might i ask which mods you feel are power tripping? You don’t have to answer if you don’t want, no pressure.

      • Hawke@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I’d rather not. Not sure if you can view the mod log for other people’s accounts, but if so it’s easy to spot from mine.

        I’ll say that I have some sympathy because dealing with internet randos is painful soul-sucking work and it’s easy to default to the ban-hammer, but…

    • Einar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Well, I completely disagree! Taking things seriously is the only way to have meaningful conversations. If we don’t challenge each other’s views, how will we ever grow and learn? We need the “battleground of ideas”!

      /s

  • darkan15@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Dislike: there is still no way to group communities into sub feeds, apart from subs, local, all. (and the work around some do of having multiple accounts seems silly to me)

  • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 hours ago

    The userbase is overall more mature and can actually discuss complex topics. Different instances have completely different feels, vibes, cultures and userbases, and that’s amazing. Some admin teams are spez wannabees but the federated structure limits the damage that they can cause.

    Relative lack of niche communities. Witch hunting is becoming a worse problem here than in Reddit.

  • PlzGivHugs@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Like:

    • Decentralized system that limits abuse

    • Great customizaion

    • It works (unlike much of the competition)

    Dislike:

    • Lack of even remotely niche content (aside from Linux and infosec content)

    • Generally very pessimistic userbase

    • Lacks polish and features in many areas

    • Currently trends towards extremist echo chambers - the fact that .ml (an instance known for banning criticism of violent, racist, authoritarian governments) is one of the biggest instances, is a good example of this.

    • tends extremely hostile to any sort of monitization, regardless of the quality or cost to produce content

  • Zonetrooper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Like:

    • It has that small-community feel still. I don’t see (perhaps because I stay out of a lot of the more tech-ey communities?) the kind of farming, low-effort, generally mediocre content I saw on Reddit.
    • Lack of the sense of a hyper-corporatized, “You’re only allowed to do things that make us money” sense that’s enshittified much of the internet lately. I’m not even sure if Lemmy can be monetized.

    Dislike:

    • Not yet large enough either. I don’t want millions of users, but I still miss a lot of the more niche hobby/discussion communities I used to be able to participate in. Even communities for fairly large hobbies or interests can be dead on Lemmy.
    • The awful political takes. Everything from typical dumbness up to advocating violence (but it’s okay because it’s my point). And it’s everywhere.