• MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    See? This. This is why I don’t trust my safety to electronic systems. The fancy computer controlled locks and latches are great when they work. When they don’t, shit like this happens.

    At least most cars still have a physical connection between the door handle and the locking mechanism. Not Tesla, for no good goddamned reason.

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    In the US there are nine investigations involving the Tesla Model Y, ranging from “unexpected brake activation” to “sudden unintended acceleration,” according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

    Nice

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Those investigations will all end with “nothing to see here” in about 3 months from now.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Those investigations will all end with “nothing to see here” in about 3 months from now

    • paddirn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      Expect those investigations to quietly go away or turn up nothing in about two months from now.

    • CPMSP@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s an apt analogue for what we should all expect from the DOGE; burning to death while everyone watches in terror.

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          3 days ago

          Yeah, it was the whole point.

          When Trump first said that, I wondered why the hell he’s talking about Musk asking for a position title that never existed, and then he tweeted out some BS AI gen of him with the title ‘DOGE’ on a nameplate in front of him.

          He basically is a 13 year old who never grew up.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        It hurts seeing a meme that was fun a decade ago get run into the ground by being used so aggressively and so long and so fucking uncoolly.

  • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    “when a crash disabled its electronic doors.”

    Female AI voice: Please stay in your seats with your seat belts on until Elon has been notified of this incident.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    This is what it says on their website. Hope you’ve got the link handy if you’re in a crash, and also that you’re not in one that doesn’t have this…

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        83
        ·
        3 days ago

        Look it’s very simple if you get in a crash and are on fire.

        Stop. Drop. Roll. Remove the mat from the bottom of the rear door pocket. Press the red tab to remove the access door. Pull the mechanical release cable forward. Remember that not all Model Y vehicles are equipped with a manual release for the rear doors. Die.

        Rolls right off the tongue. If you’re still in trouble call 0118 999 88199 9119 725 3.

    • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      3 days ago

      Not all Model Y vehicles are equipped with a manual release for the rear doors.

      I think I see a problem.

      Also: that’s waaaay too many steps for an emergency. Imagine trying to dismantle the door trim when you have a concussion.

    • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 days ago

      This is what it looks like when they’re legally forced to do something, but still don’t want to do it, and their customers are idiots who can afford to pay for redundant features.

      So you know, goverment inefficiency. /s

    • DiagnosedADHD@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Realistically they should show the owners at the dealership and make sure they open it several times before taking it off the lot then reinforce it in software and make them release it once a month.

      Or you know… just make it mechanical

        • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 days ago

          It used to not lower the window and could damage the window.

          Shortly after the 3 was released it was changed. When there is power it lowers the window now.

          But if there is no power, it can’t lower the window and it may break.

      • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        And what about the passengers? Is the owner going to be required to give an airline attendant “emergency exits are located here” safety speech every time someone hops in the car with them? Can we actually trust them to do so?

        Also, not all models have mechanical release mechanisms in the rear doors. There are models where it is 100% possible to just be locked in the back seat. And when you only have ~15 seconds to escape before the lithium flames+smoke cook you, you’re not going to be able to crawl to the front.

    • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      make everything electronic because Elon thinks it is super cool

      put very inefficiently placed manual overrides because it was a bad idea

    • madcaesar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s so easy! When you get in a crash are panicking and disoriented, who needs a simple quick lever that’s there at all times??? Simply follow these complicated 3 steps to extract yourself from the burning vehicle!

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      Or they could try a front door, which is much more straightforward

      • leftytighty@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        3 days ago

        What important living beings go in the back anyway? It’s usually just babies, pets, and children.

        • nomous@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          They should’ve just read the owners manual (and hoped their car was equipped with an emergency release) not my fault they’re lazy.

  • boaratio@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I can’t believe there isn’t an NHTSA regulation about manual egress from an unpowered vehicle. This is just bonkers.

    • DiagnosedADHD@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      There are manual releases but they’re hidden. They need to be more obvious because these cars are rented to people and obviously the owners aren’t taking the time to figure out where they’re at.

      I would also think just having secondary power packs in each door would help in the event power is cut to ensure the doors can continue to function for a few minutes while also a speaker could explain how to use the emergency release if none of the doors are working.

      All this added complexity and cost isn’t worth it to me, manual doors just make sense for so many reasons.

      • Zron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        ·
        3 days ago

        Or, how about this: it’s a door, have it work like every other car door for the last 70 years.

        Redesigning stuff to make it “cool” and “futuristic” is fucking stupid and is clearly not safe. Doors have handles, the handles are pulled to open the door. Keep it simple.

      • Ultraviolet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        The reason given for hiding them just makes that fact worse. It’s for “aesthetics”. Manual latches don’t look futuristic enough.

      • h4lf8yte@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 days ago

        Eject the doors with explosives as soon as the vehicle velocity is zero and fuck everyone else. Tumbler style.

      • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        The front handles aren’t hidden. They’re so obvious everyone I take in my car tries to use them first if I don’t tell them.

        Back doors is a whole other story.

        • Sporkbomber@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          That’s if they have them. Apparently some models of the Y don’t come with manual back door releases.

          • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Back doors is a whole other story.

            Thats what this means. The back seats are hit and miss depending on the vehicle.

            • Sporkbomber@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              3 days ago

              I thought that was more in reference to the release being hidden under a mat to access. The fact that ‘a whole other story’ could be misconstrued two ways I think just shows how bonkers this is 😂

    • Undearius@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      When I rode as a passanger in a Tesla Model 3, the owner told me not to use the big pull handle because it was the manual release, and instead to use the button at the top of the grab bar.

      I don’t know about the other models but the manual release was a more obvious way to open the door than the intended way.

      • Sporkbomber@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Only for the front seats, and on something like the Y not all models even have manual releases in the back. The ones that do have them covered with a mat and no indication where they are.

        On the model Y you need to removal a speaker grill to manually release the doors in the back.

    • rando895@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah, imagine if the air brakes failed on a transport truck and instead of them defaulting to on, they no longer worked…

      Or if your Anti-lock braking system defaulted to no brakes instead of brakes without Anti-lock

      Or if the power goes out an elevator just falls to the ground

      Or if…

  • Pirky@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    276
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    When I first learned that Teslas (and almost all other EV’s) have electronic only doors, I knew this kind of situation would happen.
    I hope this gets laws enacted that force manufacturers to install mechanical latches on all of their vehicles. I know Teslas have manual overrides on their front doors, but the rear doors still have this issue.

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      84
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I hope this gets laws enacted that force manufacturers to install mechanical latches on all of their vehicles.

      Considering Musk’s love affair with the incoming administration, I wouldn’t bet on it for the next 4 years (hopefully)

      In fact I’d be happy to just have the NHTSA avoid being dismantled in the next 4 years

      • NewNewAccount@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        3 days ago

        Just how California had laws that effectively forced automakers to make nationwide changes, Europe can still mandate this and it may end up here regardless.

        • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          3 days ago

          The cybertruck is already illegal here in the EU since it doesn’t comply with pedestrian safety laws.

        • cm0002@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          I don’t think it will have as much of an effect on the auto industry I’m afraid, the auto industry is already well used to having multiple regional models to comply with weird country quirks of their own vehicle safety boards.

          Any EU mandate will just get through onto the already existing model destined for EU countries. Unless the EU writes it in such a way to force companies to abide by it in all countries even non-EU, but that would be a legal gray area for sure.

          It works for Cali because no company is going to have multiple regional region cars (i.e. states), that would be a step to far for them lol

      • Comment105@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        In general, this isn’t exactly a safety conscious administration in those terms.

        Prepare to see a lot more products with serious safety issues coast by disinterested regulators and become popular with your friends and family. Peppering your life with a little extra spice.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Mid-terms are in 2 years!

        NHTSA is part of the executive, so he would still have control over it, but we can at least hopefully place restrictions on his power (or impeach) in 2, assuming the election still happens and the results are accepted.

    • Nougat@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      95
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s like if Titanic not only didn’t have enough lifeboats, but instead had no lifeboats, and also everyone was locked in their cabins.

      • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        68
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        The Titantic was designed to stay afloat long enough to allow everyone to disembark in cohorts on life boats to rescue boats and send the lifeboats back for the rest- it was never intended to fit everyone on lifeboats all at once.

        It was that a mix of how telephone operators made more money off personal telegrams than ice warnings, and didnt relay the messages, and how nearby possible rescue ships had gone to bed and turned off their radios meant this process didn’t get executed, and how because the iceberg hit the ship, essentially creating a large gash the entire length of the ship, causing the flotation bulwarks to be breached, which is a very rare occurrence, caused so much death.

        In Tesla’s case, that much aforethought hasn’t been taken.

        • TheWolfOfSouthEnd@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          People weren’t meant to stay in the life boats? That’s a new one on me, I’d read that they had space more life boats but utilise it, instead going with the legal minimum.

          Yes, I know I’m derailing the topic at hand, but I’m interested.

      • warm@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        In this case, they have lifeboats (apparently), they were just all hidden down in the ship somewhere (apparently).

        • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          False: “All but two lifeboats were situated on the Boat Deck, the highest deck of Titanic.”

          “Titanic only had enough lifeboats to accommodate approximately a third of the ship’s total capacity.”

          “Compounding the disaster, Titanic’s crew was poorly trained on using the davits (lifeboat launching equipment). As a result, lifeboat launches were slow, improperly executed, and poorly supervised. These factors contributed to several lifeboats leaving with only half their capacity.”

          But seems they launched 18 out of 20 available.

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lifeboats_of_the_Titanic

          • jqubed@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            26
            ·
            3 days ago

            I believe @[email protected] is referring to how Teslas have electronic door releases instead of mechanical handles and they don’t work in a fire. There is a mechanical emergency override (I think only on the front doors) but it’s not obvious and there have been multiple deaths from people who could not figure out how to escape from burning vehicles.

            To me it’s the most egregious example of Tesla not knowing the basics of how to build a car or eschewing user experience conventions that have been developed over more than a century of car building for good reasons in favor of trying to be modern or futuristic.

            • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              Thx, okay I didn’t get it but makes sense. Yeah it’s really stupid to “reinvent” everything and offhandedly brush away the things that have been written in blood during previous decades… I mean it’s kind of obvious that a safety mechanism needs to be fast and easy to operate. Making someone disassemble a door while on fire and blind from the thick smoke might not be the best idea. And you’d need to perform some safety dance each time before boarding a Tesla or people/passengers won’t know the strange procedures.

    • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      3 days ago

      When I first learned that Teslas (and almost all other EV’s) have electronic only doors

      I really just want a regular car with an EV power train. Don’t to change a bunch of shit on the car, unless it is germane to its function as an EV. Things like doors, instrument clusters, turn signals, infotainment, HVAC controls, shifting (e.g. park, reverse, drive) should be the same as any other vehicle.

      • mm_maybe@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        3 days ago

        You want an e-Golf, which was a beautifully stupid, half-hearted implementation of an EV by Volkswagen, who because they really didn’t want to do it, spent almost nothing on redesign, and in the process creating a ridiculously fun vehicle to drive with sporty handling and high torque at low speed, but nothing else changed from the classic Golf design. Door handles, freaking dials on the dashboard, manual climate and audio controls. Sadly, it isn’t being made anymore. We’ve outgrown ours and it’s time for me to let someone else enjoy the experience (especially with the Biden used EV sales incentives going away soon) but my daughter loves it so much that I’m dreading the tantrum that I know will come when I sell it.

    • vxx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 days ago

      Most manufacturers use the door handle to override the electronic system. Like pulling twice or harder than usual.

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        That’s fine then. We’re relearning why all cars with manual transmissions have the same foot pedal and shift pattern arrangement. It’s so in a panic situation, people aren’t having to orientate themselves mentally and can just go off of muscle memory to save themselves. I should be shocked that Tesla didn’t hire any auto industry veterans that know that, but I’m not. This reeks of software dev shit where every new MBA coming in just has to shake things up and reinvent everything so they can leave their mark.

        • dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          Anyone who has ever been in a Tesla knows they’re a software company, not a car company. The cars are made like crap.

          I still wouldn’t go back to ICE though.

          • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            Nothing about having an EV drive train requires electric doors. Others have already said that other EVs have manual doors or manual override for panic situations.

            • dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              Didn’t say I wouldn’t go back to manual latches, just not going back to ICE (or selling my almost paid cars) because elon is a twit or they are unreasonably dangerous in the event of a freak accident.

              This is a stupid problem to have, but expected value says most people will never have it.

              • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                3 days ago

                Nobody asked you to sell your car. Stop taking this discussion personally.

                Also, Expected Value is irrelevant for safety features.

                • dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 days ago

                  Dude shut up lol. Everybody is jerking off on Tesla for an admittedly gnarly problem that will affect practically no one. Yes it’s stupid, but so is your furious masturbation to Tesla issues at the expense of actually reading the comments.

                  And yes, expected values against risk are literally all that matter. If that was not the case, no car would ever move from the assembly line for fear of rolling over a toddler or crashing into a cyclist. Pucker up your flapping butthole you’re talking out of and collect yourself. People will still stroke your weiner for saying “Tesla bad” even if you resort to reading and discussion; it will be ok. Stop putting words in other commenters mouths.

        • TassieTosser@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          I read an article that Teslas are designed to have thier electrics in a daisy chain to avoid big ugly bundles of wires. But that just means a failure propagates down the chain so non critical systems can take out critical ones. Clearly he doesn’t listen to or hire car engineers.

    • mephiska@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      The model Y has mechanical emergency door openers in the front. Not in the rear. It complains about possibly breaking window trim when you use them.

      They are not super obvious though and you’d have to know in an emergency.

      • ch00f@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yeah the releases in the 3 and Y aren’t too bad. Most people use them by mistake once or twice (and get the warning about window trim).

        The X however is unforgivable. You have to pop off the speaker grills to get to them and then the door also weighs a lot and has to be manually lifted upwards.

        • snooggums@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          3 days ago

          You have to pop off the speaker grills

          Oh yes, the obvious thing to do when trying to escape a fire.

        • Nyxon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          No, on the X there is a lever just below the open door button on the front doors. I have seen multiple people use it instead of the button because the button in the front door is less obvious to them then the lever.

          • ch00f@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            I’m talking about the back doors. But yes. I incorrectly compared the front doors in the 3/Y with the back doors of the X.

      • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 days ago

        Same with the Model 3.

        I have to disagree with them not being obvious however. Nearly every new person in my Model 3 goes to grab the emergency release immediately. I even added vinyl door open stickers next to the button to make it more obvious and it still happens almost every time.

        • mephiska@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          Yes I wasn’t clear. They aren’t obvious for rear seat passengers. They are in a reasonable and semi obvious place for front seat passengers. The very first time I was in a model y I pulled the emergency door pull thinking that was the handle.

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      Shouldn’t an electric be programmed to open if it finds itself undergoing powerloss? Isn’t that like a very basic failsafe? One so basic it’s the plot to an indie horror game that wasn’t intended for children but found an audience there anyway?

      • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Clearly Tesla opted for the fail-deadly route instead of the fail-safe route. Fuckin ridiculous.

        In all honesty, I don’t see a good solution to electronic doors. If the power dies while it’s just sitting in your driveway, now it’s open, if the doors open on electricity loss. Definitely better than what they have now, but I’d prefer something completely different. Like what if we had a series of levers and cables that opened the door? I know, it’s like, next level crazy, but maybe…

      • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 days ago

        this is why electric locks should NOT be relied on for safety: electric locks MUST default open when something goes wrong, which means that picking them is as easy as making them malfunction or cutting the power.

        • uis@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Except power cables are inside and to pick them you first need to pick them.

    • ramenshaman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      The model 3 and Y both back mechanical backups. I suspect the S does too. The back doors on the X definitely don’t, but that’s not the only questionable design decision on the X.

      • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        but that’s not the only questionable design decision on the X.

        They didn’t want sliding doors because that makes it a minivan. And minivans are “uncool”

        • ramenshaman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          So give it regular-ass doors like every other SUV. Now Tesla’s only full-size SUV (as well as their only “truck”) are not compatible with a roof rack. If I get an SUV or a truck it’s because I want to move a bunch of stuff around, and I 100% will get a roof rack because of that.

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      They have mechanical overrides but look whee some of them are. Have to remove a door panel.

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Some of the cheaper ones skip the overrides in the back to deliver more value to shareholders.

    • snekerpimp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      With lord Elon presiding over god king trumps “economy”, I wouldn’t count on that. Adding that safe guard measure would cost him too much.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      3 days ago

      Teslas (and almost all other EV’s) have electronic only doors

      1. but Teslas don’t.
      2. we never pluralize with an apostrophe.
  • NutWrench@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Yeah but mechanical car door handles aren’t “Cool.” You don’t want to have a car that isn’t cool, right?

    • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      3 days ago

      Some GenZ kids were talking about how cool rolling up a window with a handle was and wished it was in cars again. It was refreshing to hear.

      • WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        3 days ago

        When electric windows became a thing I considered it a downgrade because it meant that I couldn’t roll down my window when the engine was off.

        • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          I was in a 2024 Cherokee and it was insanely frustrating trying to get the window to where I wanted it.

          It also looks absolutely nothing like a Jeep Cherokee. They should just say Jeep SUV on them.

  • Nougat@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    163
    ·
    3 days ago

    There is a manual override in Tesla cars but the feature is not widely publicized, experts say.

    Tesla isn’t the only culprit here. Any manufacturer that makes cars with electric doors should be required to also have a prominent and easily reachable manual override, instead of hiding a tiny lever underneath the armrest or on the floor, or behind the person’s seat on the pillar somewhere, or any fucking place that isn’t where you would expect a door handle to be.

    • warm@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      140
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Should just be a law to have a regular fucking door handle, we don’t need fancy/electric doors. Telsa’s should all be taken off the road with their shitty track record.

        • warm@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          27
          ·
          3 days ago

          Considering he will be leading a government department he just called “DOGE”, along with the rest of Trump, I’d say the USA is royally fucked, Tesla will be the least of their troubles.

          You reap what you sow.

        • Monument@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          This is morbid but one of my favorite “butterfly” effect news stories in the last year was around the death of Angela Chao after she backed her car into a pond while intoxicated.

          Okay, so - here’s the setup:
          The Chao family is a very wealthy family. In the 1960’s the family patriarch got into the shipping business and has done very well, garnering money and power. Wealth and power beget wealth and power. Mitch McConnell is even married to one of the daughters - Elaine Chao.
          Well, Bush appointed E. Chao to Labor Secretary during his presidency. Mind you, she’s not just Mitch’s wife - she has been in government since the late 80’s. One of the talking points in republican circles during the Bush years was that there was a massive decrease in worker safety complaints. They attributed this to businesses behaving themselves and say that this is evidence that self-regulation can work. What was learned later is that OSHA simply didn’t enforce many regulations or follow up on many complaints, instead choosing to focus on trying to find fraud within unions.
          Cut to Trump. He appoints Elaine - still Mitch McConnell’s wife, and daughter of a transportation magnate - to be the Department of Transportation’s Secretary. The ethics concerns notwithstanding, the department hand waved many things through, such as the tesla doors mentioned in the article above, as well as the Tesla Model X’s confusing forward/reverse system, which is cited as being a reason for the death of Angela Chao, her sister.

      • zurohki@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        3 days ago

        IIRC it’s because if the frameless window setup Teslas use - it needs to wind the windows down slightly before you open the door, so it uses an electronic control to tell the car to do that.

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Ok, just like other brands do with regular fucking handles? All convertibles have that, the handle is still mechanical with an electronic switch to lower the window, but if the switch doesn’t work it doesn’t prevent you from opening the door!

    • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.catOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      56
      ·
      3 days ago

      Or, you could just have the door handle be the manual override.

      It is a laughably easy thing to have the release for the door from the inside be the same kind of mechanical door release we’ve always done, for obvious safety reasons, and then have a little solenoid which can also trigger the release of the mechanical door release if the computer wants it to open.

      The only reason to do it otherwise, and then need a separate manual release handle, is if you are okay with people dying in exactly this fashion so that you can make your shiny thing in the exact shiny way you want to make it.

      • zurohki@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        3 days ago

        Teslas need to crack the windows before you open the door, that’s why they complicate the door release. If you don’t give the computer a moment to move the window before the door opens you can damage things.

        • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Tesla isn’t the only manufacturer of doors with frameless windows. They are the only ones I know of who have electric-only door latches.

          The computer can have the window cracked before the handle is fully pulled. And if it fails to do so, the door opens anyway.

          A better solution is a fucking window frame.

          • shadow@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            3 days ago

            My car has frameless windows. But they don’t need the window to be in any particular place. Literally 100% up or down, and the door works fine. I don’t understand why they designed cars that have this problem.

            But yeah, framed windows work great too.

        • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.catOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          Thank you for giving the explanation, but I think you’re getting flamed for it because it sounds like you’re saying that decision makes sense.

          They introduced the design constraint. They can remove it, or work around it mechanically. They chose not to, and instead made a death-trap on purpose. I’m sure they had their reasons at the time, but they are by definition bad reasons if they led to this outcome.

          • TassieTosser@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 days ago

            He’s getting flamed because convertibles have been doing frameless door windows forever with manual overrides. It’s not something super special Tesla has done. Musk just doesn’t want to spend the extra money doing it right.

          • Universal Monk@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            They chose not to, and instead made a death-trap on purpose

            I don’t think it’s a death-trap “on purpose,” but it’s def a death-trap by negligence. Which is still bad. Very very bad.

              • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                People are saying “Tesla needs the window to lower before the door opens” as an excuse why they use an electric switch, I’m saying they don’t know shit about cars because that’s been a thing for decades before Tesla was even an idea and these cars used regular door handles.

      • can@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        That’s abysmal. Let’s make it’s extra hard where children are far more likely to be.

        • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          And have the presence of mind to do this after a collision and the vehicle is on fire.

          There’s a reason that building egress (at least for commercial) is the way it is, with things like push bars and opening outwards. It’s because people do not think clearly in emergency situations.

        • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          … the back doors that have child locks already on them so THEY CANT be opened by said children…?

          That’s what argument you want to use? Seriously? Lmfao the shit people come up with sometimes.

          • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            An emergency release should bypass the child locks. Looks like you’re the one lacking imagination.

            • Gawdl3y@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 days ago

              The emergency release does bypass the child lock. That’s why it’s in a hidden spot in the back doors, because otherwise the child lock would be pointless.

            • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              And the reason why it’s hard to access is so a kid can’t accidentally open it and fall out….

              Having it bypass the child locks defeats the singular purpose of the child lock lmfao. What is with these arguments?

              • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                3 days ago

                You can have adults sitting at the back with child lock on, you want any emergency system to bypass other systems that might block them.

                Please, never work in safety.

                • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  8
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 days ago

                  You should NEVER have an adult in the back with the child lock on… since they couldn’t escape in an emergency….

                  Normal vehicles don’t have a bypass, so an adult would be locked in any vehicle if it was on….

                  Tesla’s atleast have a feature to overcome this….

                  It’s quite sad that you needed this explained…. Do you even own a drivers license? If you do, please turn it in for the safety of everyone on the road, not just the adults you lock in the back seat…

          • can@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            The ones that have to be enabled and I haven’t stated thoughts on either way?

            • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              Yes so what difference does a hard to make emergency access do when in any normal car they can be locked in…?

              It’s hard to access so kids CANT open the door while it’s moving and fall out. Thats why vehicles have the child lock feature available… it’s quite sad that you need this explained.

                • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 days ago

                  And? A child can be locked in the back of any vehicle with no way out, atleast teslas have a way to still get out… leave it on, and no law an adult is locked back there, with no override to get out. And that’s your Honda, not even a fancy electric car….

                  The point is, they’re crying about children being locked in the back, yet any current vehicle you’ve been able to chose to do that for bloody decades already, yet a car with a feature to overcome that is being decried. You were locked in the back of your parents car, it’s unsafe for children to be able to open doors while driving, so it’s prevented for their safety.

                  The hypocrisy that people show just to be mad at something with one actually comprehending why…

      • subtext@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        3 days ago

        Who the fuck thought this up

        1. Remove the mat from the bottom of the rear door pocket.
        2. Press the red tab to remove the access door.
        3. Pull the mechanical release cable forward.
  • beefbot@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    That one’s a deal breaker. Never getting in an Tesla again. And yes, that means a lot of taxi cabs 🤷‍♂️🙄

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    Find a good lawyer and sue the living shit out of Tesla and “Leon.” I agree with the majority of the comments.

    • PagingDoctorLove@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      They might all have one but if not, get one that has a seat belt cutter on it. And keep it in the front console, not anywhere in the back or in the glove compartment.

      I knew someone (an acquaintance, we weren’t close) who died in a crash because their seatbelt got stuck and they couldn’t get out. They had one of those cutter hammer combos but it was in the back seat. Absolutely nightmarish.

      • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Also fix it to the console with a clip. Can’t use the cutter when it is out of reach because the car flipped over. And buy more than one, driver could become incapacitated after a crash while the backseat passengers are stuck.

      • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        My dad was driving a truck full of pigs back in the 70s. He was driving with 2 friends in a very heavy rain. They were crossing a shitty Mexican bridge when they lost traction and went off into the river upside down. The river/channel was narrow so they doors wouldn’t open. They managed to break the windshield and escape. None of the pigs survived. But neither the pigs nor my dad or friends were wearing seatbelts… because Mexico and 1970’s, reasons, etc. I mean the truck was a Datsun and those things did not have seatbelts installed from what I recall.