I’d like to see just how horrible someone can make a site. Facebook is a good contender.

  • TriflingToad@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
    0·
    4 hours ago

    I think the time I was like 7 and was looking at hamster photos on Google to print and cut out. Scrolling along I couldn’t find any that looked exactly like my hamster named Cinnamon after a black streak along his back.
    Getting to the 3rd or 4th “load more” buttons on Google and it started showing me stuff that wasn’t hamsters I got desperate. I saw there were a few images that had text along the top and bottom, “for more cute hamster photos go to xhamster.com”.

    So naturally, I went there.

    Turns out xhamster.com was not a site where hamsters share selfies and is, instead, pornography.

  • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
    0·
    11 hours ago

    fcc.gov. Those goddamn “Sign into the Federal Fucked Up Document System with your FFUDS PIN now” things that just don’t actually work. The layers of garbage between you and renewing an amateur radio certificate is truly Idiocratic.

    • nickiwest@lemmy.world
      0·
      4 hours ago

      This sounds very similar to the Kentucky online portal for teacher certification. It looks like it was made in 1996, and it functions slightly less well than it looks like it should.

  • Battle Masker@lemmy.world
    0·
    16 hours ago

    Publisher’s Clearing House.

    So this company has ads on local free tv stations in the US about how you could win $5000 a week for life, but when you go to the website it’s like 97% ads and maybe 2% contests, and some contests are straight up unenterable if you have an adblocker. Then before you can officially enter, you have to go through 3 pages of ‘as seen on tv’ crap that it tries to sell you before you can finish entering. Also it lags like a motherfucker with or without an adblocker, cause there’s so many ads taking up that much bandwith, cause heaven forbid a webpage ad be a static image. And of course you have to have an account, so your spam folder and paper mailbox fill up with the worst things possible.

  • elephantium@lemmy.worldEnglish
    0·
    17 hours ago

    It’s hard to pick out one as THE worst, but generally, if I have to use the site for some external reason, the experience is awful.

    Health insurance, doctor’s offices, etc are generally pretty bad. Oddly, tax sites aren’t as rough.

    Also oddly, vacation related websites are awful.

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    0·
    18 hours ago

    literally any restaurant website. I disabled Facebook from my entire network (pihole).

    I can no longer order food on a website because Facebook is deadzoned.

    Also, about half of big box brick and mortar online stores stopped working as well.

  • 1hitsong@lemmy.mlEnglish
    0·
    1 day ago

    Seemingly every recipe website. They tell a long, unrelated story, cover the page with ads, popups, slideouts, timer triggered ads, videos, etc.

    It’s almost impossible to see the recipe under all the crap.

    • Shard@lemmy.world
      0·
      1 day ago

      These were some of the first sites to be enshittified. The more you scroll that more ad revenue they got. So they hid the actual recipes and steps under a back story longer than the dune books that forced you to scroll and hit ad after ad.

    • steeznson@lemmy.world
      0·
      5 hours ago

      Unfortunately people always go on the “shock site” boards like /b/ and /pol/ instead of checking out the more niche ones like /po/ (papercraft and origami) and /tg/ (traditional games) which are much more like regular hobbyist forums/image boards. I can see why one awful experience would sour the whole thing though and some of the people who post there are sad excuses for human beings.

      Edit: Just as an example this is the oldest thread on 4chan at the moment. It was created in 2016 and is still active. It catalogues OP’s struggle to make an origami clock.