I’d like to see just how horrible someone can make a site. Facebook is a good contender.

  • neidu3@sh.itjust.worksM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Eons ago I made a shocksite-“game” that where you basically could trick people into visiting, and you got a point for each visit. The site was basically a collage of the usual such as goatse, tubgirl, et.al. I guess that was the worst, and putting no effort into the design didn’t help either.

    Anyways, years went by, and I didn’t have time or interest in maintaining it anymore, so I let the domain name Expire. I chuckled a bit a while back when I realized that the domain had been bought by a jewelry brand, and the used it as a webshop. If only they knew the history… they obviously haven’t checked out the internet archive for that domain.

    • Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      You spin a wheel and they ship you free meat. I couldn’t disagree with you more. I recommend anyone try it out. I don’t know why it exists, but my freezer is stocked.

    • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      You spin me right round baby right round.

      Lord I remember my friends throwing this shit on school computers…

    • phoneymouse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Reminds me of freshman year in college… people would sneak into each others rooms and put it up on each other’s computers, trying to see if they could set a record for most spins.

  • BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Stileproject and rotten.com were absolute horror shows. Stileproject just seems to be porn now, but I saw a photo once in like 2005 or so of a guy standing on his head with his legs apart with a full size fire extinguisher jammed deeply into his ass.

    • kratoz29@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      How do you even land there?

      I only know 4chan through comments, I wouldn’t even bother looking for another site like that lol.

      • Zorque@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        4chan wasn’t even the first, it was an English version of a japanese site (futaba channel) which was an image board version of a forum (2channel).

        Back in the late aughts, there were a ton of *chan sites. Some even more unsavory than 4chan.

  • emmetcooper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    In terms of social, political, and geopolitical harm, no platform beats Facebook. At least in X there are community notes. In Facebook, none of that.

  • Zak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    How are we measuring?

    • Global harmful impact: it’s hard to beat Facebook
    • Disgusting: long ago, I got a spam advertising a dedicated CSAM site. I looked to see it it was really what it said, and sent it to NCMEC when I saw that is was
    • Actively malign: 8chan is up there, as are old fashioned hate groups.
    • Gregor@gregtech.euOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I kinda meant horrible design, but I guess these categories are good measurements too

  • stinky@redlemmy.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    With Facebook and x.com you pretty much understand the risks going in.

    But with stack overflow there’s so much naivete required to create an account and begin asking questions. The good stuff is laid out right in front of you: people asking similar questions and getting thoughtful responses to deeply technical questions. It feels rewarding to get your first answer approved.

    But then after months of “trying” you hit the wall. A sudden deluge of hostility and toxicity. Bipolar moderation staff suddenly deciding your content has no value and dumping you on a curb at night with a shitty smug comment, to the applause of bloodthirsty hoards of bootlicking trolls.

    Nothing could have prepared you for this. It’s hell. All of your work for nothing, any chance of justice or restitution gone. Every promise broken.

    It’s insidiously evil and I hope every member of their staff (unpaid moderators included) goes bankrupt and loses their home to foreclosure.

    • ryedaft@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      The landing page for Google looks fine and clean and everything but look at the source and you see an absolute nightmare

  • I thought Twitter was a stupid idea when it first started. 140 character limit? What the fuck is the point? The fact they increased that limit shows it was dumb. Everything else about the site just gives further reason to hate it.

    • chaosCruiser@futurology.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      That limit came from the days of SMS. The idea was that you can’t go to the internet, because data is expensive, the network doesn’t exist, your dumb phone can’t even open websites etc. However, you can send SMS messages, and those things have a 160 character limit.

      • flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Do does that mean they took an existing limitation from the SMS protocol, that didn’t apply because it used data instead and then shoehorned it into a godawful web 2.0 monstrosity all the same (and bear in mind, this is significantly reducing the unnecessary character limit!)

        • chaosCruiser@futurology.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          In 2006 the restriction did apply. The idea was that you would type the message on a computer, and let Twitter send a few SMS messages to a small group people.

          You weren’t supposed to have millions of followers or write a full length blog post using a hundred short messages. The idea was that you cold reach people quickly even though they didn’t have access to a proper computer or the internet. So much has changed in the past 18 years…

            • chaosCruiser@futurology.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              Back in the bad old days, messages cost you real world money. If you wanted to reach lots of people by SMS, it would be pretty expensive. Might as well let Twitter pay for the messages, especially when you’re just writing a public announcement.

                • chaosCruiser@futurology.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  I’ve heard some strange stories about a mysterious land on the other side of a vast ocean. In this far-away land of countless wonders, companies are only symbolically restricted by laws. This means that they can legally exploit their employees and customers in all sorts of creative ways, and charge pretty much whatever they want. Maybe you’ve heard similar wonderful tales as well?